1887

Abstract

Summary

As of February 2022, when Russia initiated its invasion, the seismic network of the Subbotin Institute of Geophysics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (IGPH) was already in urgent need of modernization due to outdated and non-standard equipment. Today, IGPH is actively working to upgrade the network to meet international standards, enhance collaboration, and improve seismic hazard assessment. This effort is supported by the ORFEUS Data Integration Grant under the Geo-INQUIRE project, along with equipment donations from GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, Gaiacode, and Universite Cote d’Azur. In 2024 and early 2025, five state-of-the-art seismic stations were deployed at existing sites. To assess seismic noise, probabilistic power spectral densities were analyzed. The upgraded stations in the Carpathian region show strong performance with noise levels matching expectations for their locations. Several upgraded stations (MEZ, RAKU, KSV) have already been integrated into the AdriaArray dataset. This collaboration strengthens regional seismic monitoring capabilities and enables the Ukrainian seismic network to contribute to international studies of tectonic processes. Data from upgraded stations are transmitted in real-time to IGPH’s data center and to the National Institute for Earth Physics (NIEP, Romania), where they are made publicly available under a CC-BY 4.0 license.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025510068
2025-04-14
2026-02-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2025/monitoring_2025/Mon25-068.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025510068&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Amashukeli, T., Farfuliak, L., Haniiev, O., & Petrenko, K. (2024). Ukrainian seismic network: Current status and challenges. Seismological Research Letters, 95(2A). https://doi.org/10.1785/0220230337
    [Google Scholar]
  2. International Seismological Centre (ISC). (2025). On-line bulletin. https://doi.org/10.31905/D808B830
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kolinsky, P., Meier, T., Agius, M., Bijedic, A. et al., (2025). AdriaArray – A passive seismic experiment to study structure, geodynamics, and geohazards of the Adriatic Plate. Annals of Geophysics. (Manuscript submitted for publication).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Krischer, L., Megies, T., Barsch, R., Beyreuther, M. et al., (2015). ObsPy: A bridge for seismology into the scientific Python ecosystem. Computational Science & Discovery, 8(1), 014003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1749-4699/8/1/014003
    [Google Scholar]
  5. McNamara, D. E., & Buland, R. P. (2004). Ambient noise levels in the continental United States. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 94(4), 1517–1527. https://doi.org/10.1785/012003001
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Peterson, J. (1993). Observations and modeling of seismic background noise. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 93–322. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr93322
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Strollo, A., Cambaz, D., Clinton, J., & 30 co-authors. (2021). EIDA: The European Integrated Data Archive and service infrastructure within ORFEUS. Seismological Research Letters, 92(3), 1788–1795. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200413
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Subbotin Institute of Geophysics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. (2023). Ukrainian National Seismic Network [Data set]. International Federation of Digital Seismograph Networks. https://doi.org/10.7914/jcvs-1309
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025510068
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025510068
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error