oa Assessment of Soil Recovery Quality Disrupted by Military Actions using Remote Sensing Methods

References

1. Baliuk, S.A., Kucher, A.V., Solokha, M.O., & Solovei, V.B. (2024). Assessment of the impact of armed aggression of the rf on the soil cover of Ukraine, Ukrainian Geographical Journal, 1, 7–18.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Congedo, L. (2021). Semi-Automatic Classification Plugin: A Python tool for the download and processing of remote sensing images in QGIS. Journal of Open-Source Software, 6(64), 3172.
   [Google Scholar]
3. FAO. (2020). Soil testing methods, Global Soil Doctors Programme (Rome). https://doi.org/10.4060/ca2796en
   [Google Scholar]
4. Hossain, M., Ferdous, N., & Ferdous, E. (2024). Crisis-driven disruptions in global waste management: Impacts, challenges and policy responses amid COVID-19, Russia-Ukraine war, climate change, and colossal food waste, Environmental Challenges, Volume 14, January 2024, 100807. https://doi.org/10.1016/i.envc.2023.100807
   [Google Scholar]
5. ISO. (2018). Soil quality - Sampling Part 203: investigation of potentially contaminated sites (ISO Standard No. ISO 18400–203:2018). Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/65226.html
   [Google Scholar]
6. Lebed, V., Solokha, M., Solovei, V., Kucher, A., & Vorotyntseva, L. (2024). Methodological and practical aspects of using satellite imagery to assess the military impact on soils, Scientific Horizons, 27 (12), 56–75.
   [Google Scholar]
7. MasiukO., DziumanV. & MatsiukV. (2024). The use of GIS technologies in determining the method of reclamation for phytotoxic mine waste dumps Int. Conf.«GeoTerrace-2024», 1. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2024510038
   [Google Scholar]
8. Masiuk, O., Novitskyi, R., Hapich, H., & Chubchenko, Ye. (2023). Elements of Assessment of the Anthropogenic Impact of a Coal Mining Mine on the Site of the Emerald Network Using Methods of Remote Sensing of the Earth. International Conference of Young Professionals «GeoTerrace-2023», Oct 2023, Volume 2023, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2023510007
   [Google Scholar]
9. Matkivskyi, M., & Taras, T. (2024). Pollution of the atmosphere, soil and water resources as a result of the RussianUkrainian war. Ecological Safety and Balanced Use of Resources, 15(1), 87–99. doi:10.69628/esbur/1.2024.87.
   https://doi.org/10.69628/esbur/1.2024.87 [Google Scholar]
10. Matsiuk, V., & Masiuk, O. (2023). Using Remote Sensing Imagery in the Study of Long-Term Dynamics of Water Bodies in the Buffer Zone of Vyazivotskyi Landscape Reserve. International Conference of Young Professionals «GeoTerrace-2023», Oct 2023, Volume 2023, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2023510079
    [Google Scholar]
11. Mykhailov, A., Makarova, V., Kapinos, N., & Petrova, N. (2021). Land management's development in the period of land relations reform in Ukraine. Studies of Applied Economics, 38(4). https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v38i4.3963
    [Google Scholar]
12. Solokha, M., Pereira, P., Symochko, L., Vynokurova, N., Demyanyuk, O., Sementsova, K., Inacio, M., & Barcelo, D. (2023). Russian-Ukrainian war impacts on the environment. Evidence from the field on soil properties and remote sensing. Science of The Total Environment, Volume 902, 1 December 2023, Pages 166122. https://doi.org/10.1016/i.scitotenv.2023.166122
    [Google Scholar]