1887

Abstract

Summary

Water-related ecosystems are valuable in providing a wide range of vital ecosystem services. However, in recent years, they have been increasingly threatened worldwide because of climate change and unsustainable human activities. This study proposes an approach to the classification of water-related ecosystems. It is built upon a surface water occurrence map (SWOM) derived from Sentinel-2 imagery to identify permanent, seasonal and no water depending on the frequency of water presence over time. Refined by vegetation content, SWOM will result in a map of general water-related ecosystems. This approach was tested on the Ramsar site Dnipro River Delta (Site #767), which was affected by Russia’s full-scale military invasion. As a result, we obtained the map of water-related ecosystems with 5 classes: 1) permanent fresh water; 2) seasonal fresh water; 3) seasonal shallow waters with sparse emergent vegetation; 4) seasonal vegetated wetland; and 5) vegetated wetland. Accuracy assessment was performed with 97.1% overall accuracy and 96.7% Kappa coefficient. The obtained results serve as a valuable foundation for ongoing environmental monitoring and wetland ecosystem service assessments, ultimately supporting better conservation and management efforts. Further research should focus on applying the developed approach to other Ramsar Sites and providing detailed land cover classification.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025510129
2025-04-14
2026-02-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2025/monitoring_2025/Mon25-129.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025510129&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Andreiev, A., & Artiushyn, L. (2024). Improvement of land cover classification accuracy by training sample clustering. Radioelectronic and Computer Systems, 2024(2), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.32620/reks.2024.2.06
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Andreiev, A., Kozlova, A., Artiushyn, L., & Sedlacek, P. (2024). Enhancement of Land Cover Classification by Geospatial Data Cube Optimization. Computer Modeling and Intelligent Systems, 3702, 292–304.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown, C. F., Brumby, S. P., Guzder-Williams, B., Birch, T., Hyde, S. B., Mazzariello, J., Czerwinski, W., Pasquarella, V. J., Haertel, R., Ilyushchenko, S., Schwehr, K., Weisse, M., Stolle, F., Hanson, C., Guinan, O., Moore, R., & Tait, A. M. (2022). Dynamic World, Near real-time global 10 m land use land cover mapping. Scientific Data, 9(1), 251. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01307-4
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Delle Grazie, F. M., & Gill, L. W. (2022). Review of the Ecosystem Services of Temperate Wetlands and Their Valuation Tools. Water, 14(9), 1345. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14091345
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., & Moore, R. (2017). Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment, 202, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hakimdavar, R., Hubbard, A. et al., (2020). Monitoring Water-Related Ecosystems with Earth Observation Data in Support of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6 Reporting. Remote Sensing, 12(10), 1634. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12101634
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Huang, S., Tang, L., Hupy, J. P., Wang, Y., & Shao, G. (2021). A commentary review on the use of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) in the era of popular remote sensing. Journal of Forestry Research, 32(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-020-01155-1
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Joint Research Centre. (2023). Earth observation in support of EU policies for biodiversity: A deep dive assessment of the Knowledge Centre on Earth Observation. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/185588
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ludwig, C., Walli, A., Schleicher, C., Weichselbaum, J., & Riffler, M. (2019). A highly automated algorithm for wetland detection using multi-temporal optical satellite data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 224, 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.01.017
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Olofsson, P., Foody, G. M., Herold, M., Stehman, S. V., Woodcock, C. E., & Wulder, M. A. (2014). Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change. Remote Sensing of Environment, 148, 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.02.015
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Popov, M. A., Stankevich, S. A., Kostyuchenko, Y. V., & Kozlova, A. A. (2019). Analysis of Local Climate Variations Using Correlation between Satellite Measurements of Methane Emission and Temperature Trends within Physiographic Regions of Ukraine. International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences, 4(2), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.33889/IJMEMS.2019.4.2-023
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Popov, M.O., (2007). Methodology of accuracy assessment of classification of objects on space images. Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, 39, 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1615/J Automat Inf Scien.v39.i1.50
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025510129
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025510129
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error