1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

Transformational processes occurring in the energy sector, along with the geopolitical conditions of the energy transition, growing energy demand, fossil fuel depletion, and changes in the availability of energy resources, are reshaping the context of research on sustainable energy development. This study systematizes the evolution of the concept of sustainable energy development and examines scientific and practical approaches to assessing Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG 7), which focuses on ensuring access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy sources.

A scientific and practical approach to assessing SDG 7 is proposed, incorporating an integrated assessment of its dynamics from 2015 to 2023 and forecasting changes in ensuring sustainable energy development in Ukraine. The results account for the impact of extreme conditions on the energy system, which significantly increase the vulnerability of the socio-economic situation due to risks and threats to Ukraine’s energy security.

The findings can be used to provide informational support for the development of national and regional energy strategies and the creation of a systemically integrated adaptation mechanism for authorities, businesses, territorial communities, local communities, and households in the context of large-scale transformations in Ukraine’s energy sector.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025510153
2025-04-14
2026-02-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2025/monitoring_2025/Mon25-153.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025510153&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Davidsdottir, B., Ásgeirsson, E. I., Fazeli, R., Gunnarsdottir, I., Leaver, J., Shafiei, E., & Stefánsson, H. (2024). Integrated energy systems modeling with multi-criteria decision analysis and stakeholder engagement for identifying a sustainable energy transition. Energies, 17(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/en17175540
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dongran, S., Meng, W., Dong, M., Yang, J., Wang, J., Chen, X., & Huang, L. (2022). A critical survey of integrated energy system: Summaries, methodologies, and analysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 266, Article 115863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115863
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gunnarsdottir, I., Davidsdottir, B., Worrell, E., & Sigurgeirsdottir, S. (2021). Sustainable energy development: History of the concept and emerging themes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 141, Article 110770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110770
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Horal, L., Metoshop, I., Shyiko, V., Pohorielov, S., Korniyenko, A., & Reznik, N. (2025). Stakeholder approach in gas consumption as a result of behavioral economics influence. In B.Alareeni & I.Elgedawy (Eds.), Opportunities and risks in AI for business development (pp. 31). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65207-3_31
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Horoshkova, L., Khlobystov, I., Trysnyuk, V., & Trysnyuk, T. (2021). Dynamic balance of natural resource use aimed at national economy's sustainable development (the case of coal mining adaptive modelling). In XIV International Scientific Conference Geoinformatics 2021 (pp. 1–6). European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Iddrisu, I., & Bhattacharyya, S. C. (2015). Sustainable energy development index: A multidimensional indicator for measuring sustainable energy development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 513–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.032
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Justinas, J., Lund, P. D., & Mikkola, J. (2021). Energy system resilience: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 150, Article 111476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111476
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kharazishvili, Y., Kwilinski, A., Sukhodolia, O., Dzwigol, H, Bobro, D., & Kotowicz, J. (2021). The systemic approach for estimating and strategizing energy security: The case of Ukraine. Energies, 14, Article 2126. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14082126
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Komelina, O., & Komelina, A. (2022). Environmental risks in implementing a sustainable development model: A scientific and practical approach. In 16th International Conference Monitoring of Geological Processes and Ecological Condition of the Environment, Monitoring 2022. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2022580268
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Komelina, O., Shcherbinina, S., & Mammadov, M. (2022). Assessment of the regional energy efficiency potential of the housing sector of Ukraine. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 181, 661–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85043-2_62
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Moslehi, T. A., & Reddy, A. (2018). Sustainability of integrated energy systems: A performance-based resilience assessment methodology. Applied Energy, 228, 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.07
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Sovacool, B. K. et al., (2020). Sociotechnical agendas: Reviewing future directions for energy and climate research. Energy Research & Social Science, 70, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101617
    [Google Scholar]
  13. nyshchenkoV., Komelina, O., & Shchurov, I. (2022). Contribution of Ukraine's sustainable energy development (modeling and forecasting). Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 181, 739–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85043-268
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025510153
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025510153
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error