1887

Abstract

Summary

The analysis of approaches to land monitoring and its challenges was carried out in the study. One of important trends is the analysis of prospects and demands to geospatial data infrastructure implementation into the land monitoring system of Ukraine. Full, actual and accurate geospatial data is important for managerial decision making on land use and land protection. At the moment, basic, periodical and operational observations of the condition of land are predefined by the extended list of factors, which cause the degradation, disturbance and contamination of land. At the current stage, the approaches to land monitoring should be revised due to warfare in Ukraine, geospatial data infrastructure development, and integration to the global and European geospatial data infrastructure. The problems of the determination of sets of geospatial data and metadata at land monitoring and their compatibility was singled out. It is suggested to predefine the informational cooperation at land monitoring with state cadastres, geoportals, geoinformational systems and registers. The factors of contamination were analysed and the practicability of transferring of data within the national geospatial data infrastructure.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025510156
2025-04-14
2026-02-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2025/monitoring_2025/Mon25-156.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025510156&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bello, I. (2024). Harnessing national geospatial data infrastructure and integrated geospatial information framework for good governance and national security. International Journal of Space Technology Management and Innovation, 1, 140–163.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Casiano, C., & Crompvoets, J. (2023). Climate Change Adaptation: The Role of Geospatial Data in Sustainable Infrastructures. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12, 10.3390/ijgi12020068.
    https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12020068 [Google Scholar]
  3. Dorosh, O., Dorosh, Y., & Fomenko, V. (2023) Preservation of soil resources which were destroyed as a result of military operations by means of land Management. Zemleustriy Kadastr Monit. Zemel, 3, 14–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Malashevskyi, M., & Malashevska, O. (2021). The aims and trends of the sustainable land tenure formation in Ukraine: The spatial aspect. Geodesy and Cartography, 47(3), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.3846/gac.2021.12791.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. MalashevskyiM., TarnopolskyiA., MalashevskaO., & TarnopolskyiY. (2021). The challenges of the provision of land consolidation with geospatial data. International Conference of Young Professionals «GeoTerrace-2021», 1, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2002). The Land Code of Ukraine. Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 3.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2003). On Land Protection. Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 39.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2020). About the National Geospatial Data Infrastructure. Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 37, 5.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Wei, R., Wei, M., Zhang, Y., Huang, X., & Liao, C. (2024). A Study on the Performance of Image Recognition Technology in Web GIS for Land Use Change Monitoring. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-2571.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025510156
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025510156
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error