oa Hydrological Geoinformation Modeling of River Basins in the Context of Mudflow Process Monitoring in Eastern Transcarpathia

References

1. Chepurna, T., Haydeychuk, A., Chepurnyi, I., Fedyk, Y., & Rushchak, V. (2023, October). Geoinformation Analysis of Mudflow Danger and Threat Assessment for Bridge Structures within the Territory of Transcarpathia. In International Conference of Young Professionals «GeoTerrace-2023» (Vol. 2023, No. 1, pp. 1–5). European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2023510017
   [Google Scholar]
2. Chepurna, T., Salyha, V., & Chepurnyi, I. (2022). To the issue of monitoring of mudflows within carpathian region using modern web GIS technology. Paper presented at the 2022 International Conference of Young Professionals, GeoTerrace 2022. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2022590024/
   [Google Scholar]
3. HazirS.Çadraku. (2022). Analyzing Morphometric Parameters and Designing of Thematic Maps Using Raster Geoprocessing Tool. Civil Engineering Journal, 8(9), 1835–1845. https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-09-06.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Information yearbook on the activation of dangerous exogenous geological processes according to EGP monitoring data). (2021). Kyiv: Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources of Ukraine.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Lindsay, J.B, Yang, W, & Hornby, D. D. (2019). Drainage Network Analysis and Structuring of Topologically Noisy Vector Stream Data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8(9):422. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ijgi809042
   [Google Scholar]
6. Mamadjanova, Gavkhar & Wild, Simon & Walz, Michael & Leckebusch, G.C.. (2018). Statistical Characteristics of Mudflows in the Piedmont Areas of Uzbekistan and the Role of Synoptic Processes for their Formation. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Discussions. 1–42. 10.5194/nhess‑2018‑128.
   https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2018-128 [Google Scholar]
7. Morway, Eric & Niswonger, R. & Triana, Enrique. (2016). Toward improved simulation of river operations through integration with a hydrologic model. Environmental Modelling and Software. 82. 255–274. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.04.018.
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.04.018 [Google Scholar]
8. National Report on the State of the Environment in Ukraine in 2021 (2021) Kyiv: State Geology and Subsoil Service of Ukraine, State Scientific and Production Enterprise “State Information Geological Fund of Ukraine”.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Podholov, V. M., & Chepurna, T. B. (2017, May). Verification of predicted values of mudflow activity in prognostic modeling of mudflow hazard. In 16th International Conference on Geoinformatics-Theoretical and Applied Aspects (Vol. 2017, No. 1, pp. 1–5). European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201701893
   [Google Scholar]
10. Selehieiev, A., Ovcharuk, V., & Hryb, O. (2023). Study of the influence of the scale of topographic maps on the values of hydrological characteristics of the river network using GIS technologies. Geodesy, cartography and aerial photography, 97(97), 32–45.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Snitynskyi, Volodymyr & Khirivskyi, Petro & Hnativ, Ihor & Hnativ, Roman. (2020). LANDSLIDES AND EROSION PHENOMENA IN THE FOOTHILLS OF THE CARPATHIAN REGION RIVERS. Theory and Building Practice. 2020. 9–15. 10.23939/jtbp2020.01.009.
    https://doi.org/10.23939/jtbp2020.01.009 [Google Scholar]
12. Trevoho, I., Prykhodko, M., Ilkiv, E., Halyarnyk, M., & Yershov, M. (2021). Application of GIS technologies for assessment of anthropogenic changes in the basins of the main rivers of Ivano-Frankivsk region and ways to optimize the nature use. In International Conference of Young Professionals «GeoTerrace-2021», Vol. 2021, No. 1, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20215K3045.
    [Google Scholar]