1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

Effective monitoring of fluid contacts in oil and gas reservoirs is essential for optimizing production, preventing early water breakthrough, and ensuring efficient hydrocarbon recovery. In depleted fields, such as those in Dnieper-Donets basin (DDb), tracking saturation changes over time helps operators make informed decisions about production strategies. One of the most reliable technologies for this purpose is Multidetector Pulsed Neutron Logging (MDPNL), which enables real-time analysis of reservoir conditions through cased wells.

This paper examines the use of MDPNL in Sigma mode to monitor fluid contacts in one of the gas fields located the axial central part of the DDb. The evolution of pulsed neutron logging technologies, highlighting the advantages of modern MDPNL tools with advanced detector arrays is outlined. The case study demonstrates the deployment of MDPNL technology for tracking gas-water contact (GWC) before and after production.

The results demonstrate the effectiveness of MDPNL technology in overcoming challenges posed by low-salinity formations. By enabling real-time monitoring without disrupting production, this technology supports strategic decision-making, enhances recovery efficiency, and optimizes field development in mature reservoirs. The findings support the broader adoption of MDPNL technology in Ukraine’s oil and gas fields to enhance recovery and optimize production strategies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025510197
2025-04-14
2026-02-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2025/monitoring_2025/Mon25-197.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025510197&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Cantini, S., Klopf, W., Revelant, R., & Verga, F. (2010). Integrated Log Interpretation Approach for Underground Gas Storage Characterization. Proceedings of SPE EUROPEC/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition. https://doi.org/10.2523/131536-ms
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Fitz, D. E. (2023). Evolution of Casedhole Nuclear Surveillance Logging Through Time. Petrophysics, Vol. 64, No. 4 (August 2023); pp. 473–501. https://doi.org/10.30632/pjv64n4-2023a1
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kumar, A., Sigtia, S., Das, J., Guha, R., Ahmed, A., Shankar, V., Kumar, S., Chauhan, N., Kumar, R., & Ramakrishna, S. (2022). Time-Lapse Pulsed Neutron Logging Helps Maximize Recoveries from Mature Field - Case Study from Mangala Field of Rajasthan, India. Day 2 Tue, November 01, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2118/211347-ms
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Machicote, S., Lisio, S. D., & Pirrone, M. (2023). The Effective Diagnostic Capability of Pulsed Neutron Logging for CCS Monitoring Purposes. https://doi.org/10.30632/spwla-2023-0055
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Pemper, R. (2020). A History of Nuclear Spectroscopy in Well Logging. Petrophysics – the SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description, 61(6), 523–548. https://doi.org/10.30632/pjv61n6-2020a1
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Schmid, G. J., Pemper, R., Dolliver, D. D., Mekic, N., & Musselman, J. (2018). A Diffusion-Corrected Sigma Algorithm for a Four-Detector Pulsed-Neutron Logging Tool. https://doi.org/10.2118/191738-ms
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025510197
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025510197
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error