oa Data-Driven Landslide Susceptibility Analysis in the Ukrainian Carpathians: A Machine Learning Approach

References

1. Ajin, R.S., Segoni, S. & Fanti, R. (2024). Optimization of SVR and CatBoost models using metaheuristic algorithms to assess landslide susceptibility. Scientific Reports, 14, 24851. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-72663-x
   [Google Scholar]
2. Can, R., Kocaman, S., & Gokceoglu, C. (2021). A comprehensive assessment of XGBoost algorithm for landslide susceptibility mapping in the upper basin of Ataturk dam, Turkey. Applied Sciences, 11(11), 4993. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11114993
   [Google Scholar]
3. Hadiatska, K., Ivanik, O., Tustanovska, L., Kravchenko, D., & Vilkhovyi, R. (2023). Regional Landslide Hazard Assessment Using Susceptibility Mapping: a Case Study on the Middle Dnieper Area, Ukraine. In Proceedings of the Fourth EAGE Workshop on Assessment of Landslide Hazards and Impact on Communities (pp. 1–5). European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2023500045
   [Google Scholar]
4. Ivanik, O., Menshov, O., Bondar, K., Vyzhva, S., Khomenko, R., Hadiatska, K., Kravchenko, D., & Tustanovska, L. (2022). Integrated approach to modelling and assessing the landslide hazards at the regional and local scale in Kyiv urbanized area, Ukraine. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 8(4), 5479–5491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01447-x
   [Google Scholar]
5. Ivanik, O., Shevchuk, V., Kravchenko, D., Yanchenko, V., Shpyrko, S., & Gadiatska, K. (2019). Geological and geomorphological factors of natural hazards in Ukrainian Carpathians. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 20(4), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/102964
   [Google Scholar]
6. Kasiyanchuk, D., & Shtohryn, L. (2021). Assessment of the ecological risks of landslide damages in the Carpathian Region. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources4(3), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.040306
   [Google Scholar]
7. Khan, D., Akram, W., & Ullah, S. (2025). Enhancing landslide susceptibility predictions with XGBoost and SHAP: a data-driven explainable AI method. Geocarto International, 40(1), 2514725. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2025.2514725
   [Google Scholar]
8. Liu, S., Yin, K., Zhou, C., Gui, L., Liang, X., Lin, W., & Zhao, B. (2021). Susceptibility assessment for landslide initiated along power transmission lines. Remote Sensing, 13(24), 5068. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13245068
   [Google Scholar]
9. Shtohryn, L., Kasiyanchuk, D., & Kuzmenko, E. (2020). The problem of long-term prediction of landslide processes within the Transcarpathian Inner Depression of the Carpathian Region of Ukraine. Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 15(1), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.26471/cjees/2020/015/118
   [Google Scholar]
10. Shtohryn, L. V., & Kasiynchuk, D. V. (2024). Analysis of natural and man-made factors of landslide development in the Carpathian region using GIS. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 5, 93–98. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2024-5/093
    [Google Scholar]
11. Tarwidi, D., Pudjaprasetya, S. R., Adytia, D., & Apri, M. (2023). An optimized XGBoost-based machine learning method for predicting wave run-up on a sloping beach. MethodsX, 10, 102119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102119
    [Google Scholar]
12. White, N., Parsons, R., Collins, G., & Barnett, A. (2023). Evidence of questionable research practices in clinical prediction models. BMC Medicine, 21(1), 339. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-03048-6
    [Google Scholar]