1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

Although the UCS-2000 system has been in operation for nearly 20 years, it is still not fully complete - particularly in terms of its vertical component. Currently, the system is based on the Krasovsky ellipsoid and uses the Baltic Height System. The development trend of modern geodetic systems is oriented toward the creation and implementation of a unified global system, such as the various realizations of the ITRS/ITRF, which provide a coordinate framework along with the ability to determine geodetic heights.

The potential transition of the UCS-2000 system to the GRS80 ellipsoid would bring about numerous changes. However, in this article, we aim to focus specifically on the impact of such a transition on the transformants of the gravitational potential, which are widely used in geodesy, particularly in work related to height determination — namely, gravity anomalies and height anomalies (quasigeoid heights).

This study presents the differences in gravity anomalies and height anomalies calculated on the GRS80 and Krasovsky ellipsoids. The resulting height anomaly differences indicate that, in the event of transitioning the UCS-2000 system to the GRS80 ellipsoid, the values would change by approximately 0.5 to 1 meter. These are significant differences that must be taken into account in all works related to height determination.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202552035
2025-10-06
2026-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2025/geoterrace-2025/GeoTerrace-2025-035.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202552035&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. DzhumanB. B., ZablotskyiF. D. (2020). About the need of modernization the Ukrainian height system. International Conference of Young Professionals «GeoTerrace-2020» 2020 (1), 1–5
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Foerste, Christoph; Bruinsma, Sean.L.; Abrykosov, Oleh; Lemoine, Jean-Michel; Marty, Jean Charles; Flechtner, Frank; Balmino, Georges; Barthelmes, Franz; Biancale, Richard (2014). EIGEN-6C4 The latest combined global gravity field model including GOCE data up to degree and order 2190 of GFZ Potsdam and GRGS Toulouse. GFZ Data Services. https://doi.org/10.5880/icgem.2015.1
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ince, E. S., Barthelmes, F., Reißland, S., Elger, K., Förste, C., Flechtner, F., Schuh, H. (2019). ICGEM – 15 years of successful collection and distribution of global gravitational models, associatedservices and future plans. Earth System Science Data, 11, pp. 647–674. http://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-647-2019
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Karpinskyi, Y. O., Vysotenko, R. O., & Kin, D. O. (2024, April 10). Ways of development of the national geodetic reference system. Proceedings of GeoForum 2024, Lviv
    [Google Scholar]
  5. MarchenkoO. N., KucherO. V., MarchenkoD.O. (2015). Regional quasigeoid solutions for the Ukraine area. Geodynamics, No. 2(19), pp. 7–14. https://doi.org/10.23939/jgd2015.02.007
    [Google Scholar]
  6. MartinaSacher, GunterLiebsch (2019). EVRF2019 as new realization of EVRS. https://evrs.bkg.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EVRS/EN/Publications/EVRF2019_FinalReport.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=4
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202552035
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202552035
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error