1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

Accurate geodetic leveling is critical for monitoring structural deformations and ensuring engineering safety. Digital levels have improved the efficiency and precision of such measurements; however, their accuracy can be influenced by geometric factors, particularly the rotation of bar-coded leveling rods. This study investigates the impact of rod rotation on measurement accuracy using the Sokkia SDL30 digital level. Two experimental setups were implemented: (1) rotating the rod at fixed distances and (2) moving the level along radial arcs with static rods. Measurements were conducted at distances of 2, 4, 6, and 8 meters, with readings taken at incremental rotation angles of up to ±75°. The results revealed a nonlinear relationship between rod rotation and reading errors, with cubic polynomial models providing the most accurate approximations (R2 = 0.79–0.97). Errors increased sharply at shorter distances (2–4 m) due to stronger perspective distortions, while at longer distances (6–8 m), the error trends became asymmetric, indicating complex interactions between projection geometry and the internal image-processing algorithms of the digital level. The study identifies a 4-meter distance as optimal for calibration and modeling, with minimal distortion observed at rotation angles below 60°. These findings support the development of adaptive correction algorithms based on rod orientation and distance, improving the reliability of high-precision leveling under field conditions. The results are valuable for both practitioners seeking to optimize field procedures and manufacturers aiming to enhance internal compensation algorithms in digital leveling instruments.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202552053
2025-10-06
2026-01-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2025/geoterrace-2025/GeoTerrace-2025-053.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202552053&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Al-QaBasI. A., FarahanM., & FawzyH. (2020). Surrounding Factors' Influence on the Accuracy of the Digital Level and Total Station. Journal of Engineering Research, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 45–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.36909/jer.v8i4.9361
    [Google Scholar]
  2. IzvoltovaJ., ChromcakJ., & BacovaD. (2024). The Effect of Critical Distance in Digital Levelling. Computation, vol. 12, no. 6, p. 111. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation12060111
    [Google Scholar]
  3. KuchmisterJ., GołuchP., Ćmielewski K., RzepkaJ., & BudzyńG. (2020). A functional-precision analysis of the Vertical Comparator for the Calibration of geodetic Levelling Systems. Measurement, vol. 163, p. 107951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107951
    [Google Scholar]
  4. RákayŠ., LabantS., BartošK., & PukanskáK. (2018). The influence of artificial illumination of invar levelling rods on the measurements with digital levels. Geodetski Vestnik, vol. 62, no. 4, p. 619–629. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2018.04.619-629
    [Google Scholar]
  5. SOKKIA (2025). SDL30 Digital Level. URL: https://eu.sokkia.com/products/levels-accessories/automatic-levels/sdl30-digital-level [access: 21.08.2025].
    [Google Scholar]
  6. SuyunovA. S., MirzaevA. A., SuyunovS. A., & TukhtamishevS.S. (2024). A Modern Solution for Metrological Provision of “Digital Niverlir – Barcode Rail” Measurement Systems. Western European Journal of Modern Experiments and Scientific Methods, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 177–183. URL: https://westerneuropeanstudies.com/index.php/1/article/view/953/618 [access: 21.08.2025].
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202552053
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202552053
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error