1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

This work presents the results of a study on the spatial variability of soil agrochemical characteristics, taking into account the topographical features of the study area. The main focus is on integrating remote sensing data, Sentinel-2 satellite imagery, and field agrochemical surveys to build a zonal agronomic analysis.

The study was conducted on a 117-hectare agricultural plot in the Ternopil region. The methodology included zonal soil sampling, creating a digital elevation model based on GPS tracking, interpolating agrochemical indicators, and analyzing the EVI vegetation index to assess vegetation condition.

Spatial data processing and result visualization were performed in the ArcGIS environment.

The study found a significant correlation between topographical parameters (such as elevation, slope steepness, and position on the slope) and soil pH distribution. A pattern was observed where acidity increased in higher areas and alkaline compounds accumulated in lower-lying areas. Isolated local anomalies confirmed the importance of topography as a factor in the redistribution of moisture and nutrients.

It was established that the combination of geo-information analysis and remote monitoring makes it possible to identify agronomically vulnerable areas which require a targeted application of ameliorants. The obtained results confirm the effectiveness of using GIS technologies in making informed decisions to optimize resource management in the agricultural sector.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202552090
2025-10-06
2026-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2025/geoterrace-2025/GeoTerrace-2025-090.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202552090&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Agrotest. (n.d.). Soil pH and nutrient availability. https://www.agrotest.cz
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bhunia, G. S., Shit, P. K., & Maiti, R. (2018). Spatial analysis of soil properties using GIS-based geostatistics models. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5798-6
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Drusch, M. et al., (2012). Sentinel-2: ESA's optical high-resolution mission for GMES operational services. Remote Sensing of Environment, 120, 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.026
    [Google Scholar]
  4. EOS Crop Monitoring. (2025). Crop monitoring platform. https://crop-monitoring.eos.com
    [Google Scholar]
  5. EOS Data Analytics. (2023, April 24). Zonal soil sampling: Advantages & best practices. https://eos.com/blog/zonal-soil-sampling/
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kussul, N., Lemoine, G., Gallego, J., Skakun, S., Lavreniuk, M., & Shelestov, A. (2015). Parcel-based crop classification in Ukraine using Landsat-8 data and Sentinel-1A data. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 12(9), 1933–1937. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2015.2437353
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu, D., Zhao, W., & Wang, T. (2016). Effects of topography on the spatial variation of soil nutrients and soil erodibility in a watershed of the Loess Plateau. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75, 1153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5956-x
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Zatserkovnyi, V., & Vorokh, V. (2024). Differential technologies of precision agriculture. Technical Sciences and Technologies, (1(35)), 292–301. https://doi.org/10.25140/2411-5363-2024-1(35)-292-301
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Yatsenko, P. V. (2023). Analysis of Sentinel-2 vegetation indices for assessing wheat crop condition. Geoinformation Systems and Remote Sensing of the Earth, (108), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2713.108.12
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202552090
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202552090
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error