1887

Abstract

Summary

This study utilized advanced methods to train well log data based on outcrop facies and then applied these models to other available well logs across the basin. The Amb Formation spans over 60,000 km2 in the Trans- and CisIndus Basins, with its maximum thickness in the western Salt Range. Using machine learning and 3D modeling techniques, a clearer picture of the basin’s structure was created. The formation’s thickness increases in the western basin, with shallow depth in the southeast compared to the northwest. It mainly consists of quartz-rich siliciclastic or pure carbonate facies, with siliciclastic content increasing in the northwest. Reservoir properties show higher porosity and permeability in the northeast, while the southwest has lower values. The Potwar Basin has higher shale volume, while the Punjab plain has lower values. Macro porosity analysis indicates low porosity (<7%) except in certain facies like AM-3, which shows good porosity in the southeast. The Amb Formation’s facies and reservoir properties resemble those of the Permian succession in the Persian and Arabian platforms, but its lack of source rock may explain its non-productivity.

Three-dimensional modelling of stratigraphic facies and reservoir properties plays an important role in exploration and research. The Upper Permian Amb Formation of the Upper Indus Basin, Pakistan, was the subject of this experiment, which used multiple datasets from the field, the laboratory and machine learning techniques to model formation properties in three dimensions. The borehole data were trained with petrographic data to predict the facies and reservoir properties in the basin using an artificial neural network algorithm . Using field, borehole samples and borehole logs, four main microfacies were identified for the Amb Formation, comprising bioclastic packstone , siliciclastic-rich bioclastic wackestone , bioclastic wackestone and siliciclastic wackestone microfacies . The intelligently predicted lithologies across the basin are grainstone, mudstone, sandstone, quartz wackestone, dolomite, sandy limestone, calcareous sandstone, bioclastic packstone, bioclastic wackestone and siliciclastic wackestone). The rock types predicted by machine learning match the petrographically determined rock types by 80%. The data generated by are modelled three-dimensionally using Sequential Gaussian Simulation (). The spatial distribution of facies shows that the bioclastic packstone facies occurs mainly in the southern and northeastern parts of the basin. In contrast, the siliciclastic-rich bioclastic wackestone facies is mainly developed in the northern parts of the basin. The bioclastic and siliciclastic wackestone facies are evenly distributed across the basin. In terms of porosity, the siliciclastic wackestone () has a good porosity value (> 7%), while the other facies have a low porosity value. The petrophysical results show an increase in the average () and effective porosity () of the Amb Formation towards the northeast and an increase in permeability () towards the west, i.e., the Trans-Indus Basin (), compared to the eastsoutheast. The volume of shale () increased towards the Potwar Basin compared to the Punjab Plain. Regarding the deposition, the potential microfacies are present throughout the Upper Indus Basin, specifically concentrated in the south.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025640005
2025-09-21
2026-02-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Pakistani-Japanese Research Group. (1985). Permian and Triassic Systems in the Salt Range and Surghar Range, Pakistan. The Tethys: her Palaeogeography and Palaeobiogeography from Paleozoic to Mesozoic, 221–312.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kazmi, A. H., & Jan, M. Q. (1997). Geology and Tectonics of Pakistan Graphic Publishers. 9789698375003, 554, 982.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kadkhodaie, A., & Rezaee, R. (2017). Intelligent sequence stratigraphy through a wavelet-based decomposition of well log data. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 40, 38–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Li, W. B., Yu, Y. L., Wang, J. Q., Bai, Y., & Wang, X. (2013). Application of Self-Organizing Neural Network Method in Logging Sedimentary Microfacies Identification. In Advanced Materials Research (Vol. 616, pp. 38–42). Trans Tech Publications Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Van Gerven, M., & Bohte, S. (2017). Artificial neural networks as models of neural information processing. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 11, 114.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Verly, G. (1993). Sequential Gaussian simulation: a Monte Carlo method for generating models of porosity and permeability. In Generation, Accumulation and Production of Europe’s Hydrocarbons III (pp. 345–356). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025640005
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025640005
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error