1887

Abstract

Summary

The literature on wellbore geomechanics discusses uncertainty analysis of wellbore stability considering uncertain geomechanical parameters. However, the interdependence of these parameters and their impact on decision-making has yet to be addressed. This paper demonstrates how the correlation of input parameters influences drilling decisions.

The traditional approach of Monte Carlo simulation and single-factor sensitivity analysis, which assumes independent parameters, was compared to a strategy that considers correlated parameters. The effect of each pair of correlated parameters was assessed using a correlation matrix. A reliable limit for a safe mud window was determined, and the consequences of the best- and worst-case scenarios of wellbore instability were assessed using a decision tree.

The findings highlight the crucial impact of parameter correlations on wellbore stability, particularly when drilling relies on percentiles such as P10 and P90. In fracture pressure prediction, strong correlations significantly narrow upper and lower bounds compared to independent parameters. This impact is more significant in fracture pressure than in collapse pressure. Additionally, single-factor sensitivity analysis ranks parameters differently than interdependent sensitivity analysis.

The proposed decision-based approach of wellbore stability analysis supports informed decision-making in the planning stage and enhances decision quality.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025640018
2025-09-21
2026-02-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aadnoy, B. S. (1991) ‘Effects of reservoir depletion on borehole stability’, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 6(1), pp. 57–61. doi: 10.1016/0920‑4105(91)90024‑H.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-4105(91)90024-H [Google Scholar]
  2. Aadnoy, B. S. (2011) ‘Quality assurance of wellbore stability analyses’, SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Proceedings, 2, pp. 851–861. doi: 10.2118/140205‑ms.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/140205-ms [Google Scholar]
  3. Abdollahipour, A. et al. (2019) ‘Sensitivity analysis of geomechanical parameters affecting a wellbore stability’, Journal of Central South University, 26(3), pp. 768–778. doi: 10.1007/s11771‑019‑4046‑2.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-019-4046-2 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ma, T. et al. (2022) ‘Effect of parameter correlation on risk analysis of wellbore instability in deep igneous formations’, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 208(PC), p. 109521. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109521.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109521 [Google Scholar]
  5. Moos, D. et al. (2003) ‘Comprehensive wellbore stability analysis utilizing Quantitative Risk Assessment’, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 38(3–4), pp. 97–109. doi: 10.1016/S0920‑4105(03)00024‑X.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-4105(03)00024-X [Google Scholar]
  6. Morita, N. (1995) ‘We 30562’, (1), pp. 533–542.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Mostafavi, V., Aadnoy, B. S. and Hareland, G. (2011) ‘Model - Based uncertainty assessment of wellbore stability analyses and downhole pressure estimations’, 45th US Rock Mechanics / Geomechanics Symposium.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Udegbunam, J. E., Aadn0y, B. S. and Fjelde, K. K. (2014) ‘Uncertainty evaluation of wellbore stability model predictions’, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 124, pp. 254–263. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2014.09.033.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2014.09.033 [Google Scholar]
  9. Zoback, M. D. et al. (2003) ‘Determination of stress orientation and magnitude in deep wells’, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 40(7–8), pp. 1049–1076. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2003.07.001.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2003.07.001 [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025640018
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025640018
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error