1887

Abstract

Summary

Seismic instrumentation is used to monitor seismicity near oil and gas activities. The instrumentation records different signal types such as microseismic events, operations, and noise, which must be classified in real-time. We use a convolutional neural network approach to classify triggered waveforms into these three different signal types. The input data for the neural network are spectrograms created from the recorded waveforms. We manually parsed recorded data to identify the best quality training dataset and tested for generalization with time. We found that the neural network achieves an overall accuracy of 97.33%, which includes a 75.00% reduction in misclassified event signals compared to a simplified template matching approach. Importantly, the data characteristics changed with time which required adjustment of the training procedure to achieve the highest accuracy, highlighting how thorough testing and monitoring performance are both important parts of any neural network implementation, particularly for systems that change with time. Using the neural network improves the accuracy of classification approaches in real-time and would allow operators to make decisions faster based on the recorded signals.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025641014
2025-09-29
2026-02-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Dokht, R.M.H., Kao, H., Visser, R. et al. [2019]. Seismic event and phase detection using time–frequency representation and convolutional neural networks. Seismological Research Letters, 90(2A), 481–490.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Mousavi, S.M., Ellsworth, W.L., Zhu, W. et al. [2020]. Earthquake transformer—an attentive deep-learning model for simultaneous earthquake detection and phase picking. Nature Communications, 11 (1), 3952.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Reynen, A., and Audet, P. [2017]. Supervised machine learning on a network scale: Application to seismic event classification and detection. Geophysical Journal International, 210(3), 1394–1409.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Vallejos, J.A., and McKinnon, S.D. [2013]. Logistic regression and neural network classification of seismic records. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 62, 86–95.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Williams, J.R., Freeman, S., and Angus, D. [2021]. A neural network approach for classifying events and blasts in real-time mining seismicity. First Break, 39(4), 51–55.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025641014
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025641014
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error