1887

Abstract

Summary

Time-lapse (4D) seismic monitoring is a key element in reservoir management. In a marine context for localized targets, instrumented wells (VSP) and ocean bottom sensors (OBN/OBC) are common acquisitions for time-lapse monitoring. In this study, we analyze the impact of VSP and OBN acquisition geometries on estimated 4D velocity anomalies. For this purpose, we designed a synthetic experiment with 4D surface and VSP acquisitions (baseline and monitor) directly inspired by a real study. The RTM migrated image obtained from surface data shows well-defined and continuous reflectors, while the migrated image obtained from VSP data suffers from significant portions of blurred or missing reflectors. From these migrated images, 4D velocity anomalies were estimated using the “Lapseis” method (wave-equation generalization of 4D warping approaches). While the anomaly obtained from the surface data agrees relatively well with the true anomaly, the estimate obtained from the VSP data is less accurate (more pronounced wobbling effect and poorly resolved at locations away from the well). This confirms that poorly illuminated areas in VSP migrated images negatively affect the quality of estimated 4D anomalies. Therefore, improving and quantifying the quality of migrated images is critical to improving the quality and reliability of quantitative 4D monitoring results.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025641021
2025-09-29
2026-02-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ben Hassine, A., Baina, R. and Valensi, R. [2025] A cost-effcient fnite-frequency inversion method to estimate 4D velocity variations. 86rd EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Duprat, V. and Baina, R. [2015] Prestack true amplitude imaging condition, chap. 780. 4075–4079.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Landrø, M. [2001] Discrimination between pressure and fuid saturation changes from time-lapse seismic data. Geophysics, 66(3), 836–844.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lumley, D.E. [2001] Time-lapse seismic reservoir monitoring. Geophysics, 66(1), 50–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. MacBeth, C., Amini, H. and Izadian, S. [2020] Methods of measurement for 4D seismic post-stack time shifts. Geophysical Prospecting, 68(9), 2637–2664.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Routh, P., Palacharla, G., Chikichev, I. and Lazaratos, S. [2012] Full wavefeld inversion of time-lapse data for improved imaging and reservoir characterization. In: SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting. SEG, SEG-2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Williamson, P., Cherrett, A. and Sexton, P. [2007] A new approach to warping for quantitative time–lapse characterisation. In: 69th EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2007. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, cp–27.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025641021
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025641021
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error