1887

Abstract

Summary

Rock physics modelling often contains errors, and finding the origins of such errors can be a starting point to fix them. For this purpose, the concept of error analysis in the form of error crossplots (petrophysical properties versus errors in modeling) is introduced to investigate the available errors. Based on the data pattern in the error crossplots, one is capable of discovering the reasons for errors in modelling. In this regard, an unconsolidated oil sand reservoir’s density and P-wave velocity have been modelled with correct and erroneous petrophysical interpretations to observe the error pattern on different crossplots. A constant bias from the error baseline, for instance, could be related to the wrong rock physics model parameter selection, or a steep slope in the data with no bias could refer to the incorrect petrophysical interpretation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025646008
2025-11-10
2026-01-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Avseth, P. Mukerji, T. and Mavko, G. [2010]. Quantitative seismic interpretation: Applying rock physics tools to reduce interpretation risk. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Saberi, M. R. [2018]. Rock-physics-assisted well-tie analysis for structural interpretation and seismic inversion. The Leading Edge, 37(12), 908–914.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Taylor, J. R. [1997]. An introduction to error analysis: the study of uncertainties in physical measurements. University Science Books, California.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025646008
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025646008
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error