1887

Abstract

Summary

Mitigating climate change requires strategies to reduce greenhouse gases from human activities. Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is a promising solution, provided suitable CO reservoirs are identified. Basalts are increasingly considered for CO storage due to their heterogeneous internal structure, connected vesicles, and high content of reactive minerals, which permanently sequester CO faster through mineral trapping than sedimentary rocks.

Immiscible two-phase flow in basalts is presumably very different compared to sedimentary rocks because of the large heterogeneity in pore sizes. However, important multi-phase flow properties such as relative permeability and capillary pressure remain poorly constrained in basalts. In this study, we use computational fluid dynamics with the Volume of Fluid (VOF) method to track the evolution of fluid-fluid interfaces. Three-dimensional X-ray micro-computed tomography (μCΤ) images of a range of pore geometries were used to simulate two-phase flow under capillary-dominated flow rates. The results were used to determine pore-scale capillary pressure (Pc) under dynamic conditions where the interfaces do not reach equilibrium. Analysis suggested that the Pc is influenced by the pore structure and size, and by the interfacial tension between the two fluid phases. This approach offers insights into preferential sites for mineralization which help predict CO migration and trapping.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202570019
2025-02-03
2025-12-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. SnæbjörnsdóttirSÓ, SigfússonB, MarieniC, GoldbergD, GislasonSR, OelkersEH. Carbon dioxide storage through mineral carbonation. Nat Rev Earth Environ. 2020 Feb;1(2):90–102.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. GunterWD, BachuS, BensonS.The role of hydrogeological and geochemical trapping in sedimentary basins for secure geological storage of carbon dioxide. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ. 2004 Jan;233(1):129–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. GardnerJE, WadsworthFB, CarleyTL, LlewellinEW, KusumaatmajaH, SahagianD.Bubble Formation in Magma. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci. 2023 May 31;51(Volume 51, 2023):131–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. McGrailBP, SchaefHT, HoAM, ChienYJ, DooleyJJ, DavidsonCL.Potential for carbon dioxide sequestration in flood basalts. J Geophys Res Solid Earth [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2024 Oct 23];111(B12). Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2005JB004169
    [Google Scholar]
  5. GolparvarA, KästnerM, ThullnerM.Pore-scale modeling of microbial activity: What we have and what we need. Vadose Zone J. 2021;20(1):e20087.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. GrayWG, BruningK, MillerCT.Non-hysteretic functional form of capillary pressure in porous media. J Hydraul Res. 2019 Nov 2;57(6):747–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. HellandJO, FriisHA, JettestuenE, SkjævelandSM.Footprints of spontaneous fluid redistribution on capillary pressure in porous rock. Geophys Res Lett. 2017;44(10):4933–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. YiotisA, KaradimitriouNK, ZarikosI, SteebH.Pore-scale effects during the transition from capillary- to viscosity-dominated flow dynamics within microfluidic porous-like domains. Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 16;11(1):3891.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. ArmstrongRT, PorterML, WildenschildD.Linking pore-scale interfacial curvature to column-scale capillary pressure. Adv Water Resour. 2012 Sep 1;46:55–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. GrayWG, BruningK, MillerCT.Non-hysteretic functional form of capillary pressure in porous media. J Hydraul Res. 2019 Nov 2;57(6):747–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. KonangiS, PalakurthiNK, KaradimitriouNK, ComerK, GhiaU.Comparison of pore-scale capillary pressure to macroscale capillary pressure using direct numerical simulations of drainage under dynamic and quasi-static conditions. Adv Water Resour. 2021 Jan;147:103792.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202570019
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202570019
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error