1887

Abstract

Summary

This study examined acoustic impedance derived from post-stack seismic inversion and machine learning for sweet spot identification in carbonate reservoirs. Sweet spots are critical for optimizing hydrocarbon exploration and production, particularly in challenging unconventional reservoirs.

Unconventional resources, such as tight gas, shale oil, and gas are becoming increasingly important for meeting global energy demands. Identifying these resources is vital for addressing the growing need for alternative sources.

This study applied two methods: post-stack seismic inversion using band-limited impedance inversion (BLIMP) and machine learning approaches using multilayer perceptron regression (MLPR), random forest regression (RFR), and extra tree regression (ETR) algorithms. It explores relationships between acoustic impedance and key parameters, including porosity (9), permeability(K), water saturation (Sw), total organic carbon (TOC), brittleness index (BI), reservoir quality index (RQI), and fracture zones (FZ).

By creating an objective function of square error between threshold and modeled parameters, and minimizing the error using L-BFGS-B optimization to determine the optimized empirical relations, this study aimed to identify promising sweet spots where water saturation fell below its thresholds, whereas porosity, permeability, TOC, RQI, and FZ exceeded their respective thresholds. This approach provides new insights into the role of acoustic impedance in unconventional characterization supporting resource optimization strategies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202571013
2025-04-29
2026-02-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amaefule, J. O., Altunbay, M., Tiab, D., Kersey, D. G., & Keelan, D. K. (1993). Enhanced reservoir description: using core and log data to identify hydraulic (flow) units and predict permeability in uncored intervals/wells. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition?, SPE--26436.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Gading, M., Wensaas, L., & Collins, P. (2013). Methods for seismic sweet spot identification, characterization and prediction in shale plays. SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, URTEC--1581559.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hu, R., Vernik, L., Nayvelt, L., & Dicman, A. (2015). Seismic inversion for organic richness and fracture gradient in unconventional reservoirs: Eagle Ford Shale, Texas. The Leading Edge, 34(1), 80–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Mardani, R. A., & Thrust, G. V. (2020). Estimation of Acoustic Impedance from Seismic Data in Well-log Resolution Using Machine Learning, Neural Network, and Comparison with Band¬limited Seismic Inversion.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Surachman, L. M., Abdulraheem, A., Al-Shuhail, A., & Kaka, S. I. (2024). Acoustic impedance prediction based on extended seismic attributes using multilayer perceptron, random forest, and extra tree regressor algorithms. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Zeyghami, M., & Taghizadeh Sarvestani, M. (2023). A comprehensive methodology for reservoir cut¬off determination. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 13(7), 1551–1573.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202571013
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202571013
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error