1887

Abstract

Summary

This study introduces an optimized methodology for mapping directional contaminant flow paths by integrating rotating surface electrodes with in-hole Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT), supported by numerical simulations and validated through field application. Surface electrodes are rotated around a borehole at multiple azimuths while keeping in-hole electrodes stationary. Four electrode configurations—A-BMN, A-MNB, AB-MN, and AM-NB—are assessed using synthetic azimuthal apparent resistivity datasets. Directional sensitivity is evaluated for two scenarios: in-panel anomalies, where surface electrodes align with subsurface anomalies, and off-panel anomalies, where anomalies are opposite the surface electrodes. Arrays with high in-panel and low off-panel sensitivity exhibit reduced symmetrical effects and enhanced directional performance. The results show that symmetrical effects and limited directionality affect the A-BMN and A-MNB arrays, while the AB-MN array displays low accuracy and poor performance. In contrast, the AM-NB array demonstrates superior accuracy, minimal symmetrical effects, and strong directionality. Field tests validate the numerical findings, revealing significant resistivity variations at specific azimuths that align with the orientation of the injection well. Rose diagrams effectively indicate dominant flow paths and contaminant migration directions. This integrated approach offers a reliable, cost-effective solution for detecting preferential flow pathways and advancing subsurface mapping techniques.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202572053
2025-05-13
2026-03-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Carollo, A., Capizzi, P., Martorana, R.2020. Joint interpretation of seismic refraction tomography and electrical resistivity tomography by cluster analysis to detect buried cavities. Appl. Geophys., 178.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Doyoro, Y.G., Chang, P.-Y., Puntu, J.M.2021. Uncertainty of the 2D resistivity survey on the subsurface cavities. Appl. Sci., 11, 3143.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Doyoro, Y.G., Gelena, S.K., Lin, C.-P.2024. Improving subsurface structural interpretation in complex geological settings through geophysical imaging and machine learning. Eng. Geol., 107839.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lin, C.-H., Lin, C.-P., Ngui, Y.J., Wang, H., Wu, P.-L., He, G.-J., Liu, H.-C.2020. Diameter assessment of soilcrete column using in-hole electrical resistivity tomography. Géotechnique, 70, 1120–1132.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Tsourlos, P., Ogilvy, R., Meldrum, P., Williams, G.2003. Time-lapse monitoring in single boreholes using electrical resistivity tomography. JEEG, 8, 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202572053
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202572053
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error