1887

Abstract

Summary

This study analyzes the time-lapse responses in the reservoir stimulation volume (SRV) before and after hydraulic fracturing through three-dimensional magnetotelluric (MT) numerical simulations and inversions. The pre- and post-fracturing states of an enhanced geothermal model are used to analyze the sensitivity of time-lapse monitoring. For the forward modeling, the three-dimensional finite element method is used to simulate the time-lapse response before and after fracturing, and the results are well analyzed. While the L-BFGS optimization algorithm is employed to perform separate inversions for different stages, and the differences in the inverted models are analyzed as the results of time-lapse inversion. This results demonstrate that time-lapse forward response can better qualitatively analyze the spatial distribution of SRV. At the same time, the time-lapse inversion results we defined can track the boundaries of SRV more effectively compared to separate inversions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202572101
2025-05-13
2026-02-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AbdallahA S, UtsugiM, AizawaK, et al., "Three-dimensional electrical resistivity structure of the Kuju volcanic group, Central Kyushu, Japan revealed by magnetotelluric survey data,"Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, vol. 400, p. 106898, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AbdelfettahY, SailhacP, LarnierH, et al., “Continuous and time-lapse magnetotelluric monitoring of low volume injection at Rittershoffen geothermal project, northern Alsace–France,” Geothermics, vol. 72, pp. 1–15, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. ArdidA, DempseyD, BertrandE, et al., “Bayesian magnetotelluric inversion using methylene blue structural priors for imaging shallow conductors in geothermal fields,” Geophysics, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 1–15, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CaoX, HuangX, YinC, YanL, et al., “3D MT anisotropic inversion based on finite-element method with unstructured grids,” Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 49–60, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ConwayD, HeinsonG, ReesN, et al., “Time-lapse inversion of one-dimensional magnetotelluric data,” Earth, Planets and Space, vol. 70, no. 27, pp. 1–9, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. DaiB, HuangX, CaoX, et al., “Forward modeling study of three-dimensional time-lapse magnetotelluric method considering induced polarization effect,” Advances in Geophysics, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1565–1585, 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. PeacockJ R, ThielS, HeinsonG S, et al., “Time-lapse magnetotelluric monitoring of an enhanced geothermal system,” Geophysics, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. B121–B130, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ThielS, “Electromagnetic monitoring of hydraulic fracturing: Relationship to permeability, seismicity, and stress,” Surveys in Geophysics, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1133–1169, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. YanL, “Advancements in Controlled Source Electromagnetic Methods for Prospecting Unconventional Hydrocarbon Resources in China,” Surveys in Geophysics, vol. 45, pp.239–276, 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. YanL, ChenX, TangH, et al., “Continuous TDEM for monitoring shale hydraulic fracturing,” Applied Geophysics, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 26–34, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202572101
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202572101
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error