Integrated Multimodal Approach for 3D Subsurface Characterization: Leveraging Geophysical, Geotechnical Methods, and Cross-Plot Analysis

References

1. Akingboye, A. S., & Ogunyele, A. C. (2019). Insight Into Seismic Refraction And Electrical Resistivity Tomography Techniques In Subsurface Investigations. Rudarsko-Geološko-Naftni Zbornik, 34(1), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.17794/rgn.2019.1.9
   [Google Scholar]
2. Golmohammadi, A., & Jafarpour, B. (2020). Reducing uncertainty in conceptual prior models of complex geologic systems via integration of flow response data. Computational Geosciences, 24(1), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-019-09908-6
   [Google Scholar]
3. Imani, P., Tian, G., Hadiloo, S., & El-Raouf, A. A. (2021). Application of combined electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and seismic refraction tomography (SRT) methods to investigate Xiaoshan District landslide site: Hangzhou, China. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 184, 104236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2020.104236
   [Google Scholar]
4. Paasche, H. (2018). About probabilistic integration of ill-posed geophysical tomography and logging data: A knowledge discovery approach versus petrophysical transfer function concepts illustrated using cross-borehole radar-, P- and S-wave traveltime tomography in combination with cone penetration and dielectric logging data. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 148, 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.11.017
   [Google Scholar]
5. Peirce, C., & Hobbs, R. W. (2024). Oceanic crust—seismic structure, lithology and the cause of the 2A Event at borehole 504B. Geophysical Journal International, 237(1), 159–189. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae029
   [Google Scholar]
6. Soliman, S. A., Shebl, S., El Khafif, A., Hazley, T. F. S., & Farag, M. H. (2021). Preliminary Assessment of the Soil Foundation Characteristics Utilizing the 2D Resistivity Imaging and Down-Hole Seismic Refraction Techniques: A Case Study in Tenth of Ramadan City, Egypt. Iraqi Journal of Science, 3587–3600. https://doi.org/10.24996/ijs.2021.62.10.17
   [Google Scholar]
7. White, D., Daley, T. M., Paulsson, B., & Harbert, W. (2021). Borehole seismic methods for geologic CO2 storage monitoring. The Leading Edge, 40(6), 434–441. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle40060434.1
   [Google Scholar]
8. Wu, X., Liu, G., Weng, Z., Tian, Y., Zhang, Z., Li, Y., & Chen, G. (2021). Constructing 3D geological models based on large-scale geological maps. Open Geosciences, 13(1), 851–866. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2020-0270
   [Google Scholar]
9. Xayavong, V., Vu Duc, M., Singsoupho, S., Nguyen Anh, D., K.N.D., P., Vu Minh, T., & Do Anh, C. (2023). Combination of 2D-Electrical Resistivity Imaging and Seismic Refraction Tomography methods for groundwater potential assessments: A case study of Khammouane province, Laos. Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences. https://doi.org/10.15625/2615-9783/18348
   [Google Scholar]
10. Xu, J., Wang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2022). Fusion of geotechnical and geophysical data for 2D subsurface site characterization using multi-source Bayesian compressive sampling. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 59(10), 1756–1773. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2021-0323
    [Google Scholar]
11. Xu, Y., Tong, X., & Stilla, U. (2021). Voxel-based representation of 3D point clouds: Methods, applications, and its potential use in the construction industry. Automation in Construction, 126, 103675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103675
    [Google Scholar]
12. Zakariah, M. N. A., & Zainol Abidin, L. S. (2018). Subsurface Characterization Using Geophysical Methods at the Proposed Site of Block 11 and Block 12, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS. Platform : A Journal of Science and Technology, 1(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.61762/pjstvol1iss1art4348
    [Google Scholar]
13. Zhao, C., Gong, W., Li, T., Juang, C. H., Tang, H., & Wang, H. (2021). Probabilistic characterization of subsurface stratigraphic configuration with modified random field approach. Engineering Geology, 288, 106138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106138
    [Google Scholar]