1887

Abstract

Summary

Offshore Thailand has the great opportunity for CCS networks and acting as a main hub for CO transport and storage activities. However, complex geological features may reduce the capacity coefficient (Cc) and increase the risk, posing challenges to Thailand’s CCS implementation. One of the most important factors in selecting for the best long-term storage location is the lateral continuity of storage reservoir where CO could be injected into porous rock formations in deep underground and trapped beneath the widespread impermeable caprock. To seek the most effective long-term storage, seismic attributes analysis could early provide valuable insight for both possible lateral continuity of potential caprock and fault zones that may disrupt the reservoir and contribute to the risk of CO leakage. This study aims to demonstrate the conceptual framework for estimating CO storage in saline aquifer formations of complex geological structures with staggered sandstones in Gulf of Thailand through a basin-scale assessment to identify the promising storage area potential. This analysis may also be applicable to areas with comparable complicated geological formations and provides guidelines for the implementation of CCS exploration initiatives in Thailand.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202573048
2025-06-30
2026-02-09

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202573048
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ajayi, T., Gomes, J. S., & Bera, A. (2019). A review of CO2 storage in geological formations emphasizing modeling, monitoring and capacity estimation approaches. Petroleum Science 16, 1028 – 1063.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bachu, S. B.-M. (2007). Estimation of CO2 Storage Capacity in Geological Media - Phase 2.. Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum (CSLF).
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Chadwick, A., Arts, R., Bernston, C., May, F., Thibeau, S., & Zweigel, P. (2008). BEST PRACTICE FOR THE STORAGE OF CO2 IN SALINE AQUIFERS. British Geological Survey.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Ringrose, P. (2020). How to Store CO2 Underground: Insights from early-mover CCS Projects. Springer Nature.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhou, Q., Birkholzer, J. T., Tsang, C.-F., & Rutqvist, J. (2008). A method for quick assessment of CO2 storage A method for quick assessment of CO2 storage formations. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control Volume 2, Issue 4, 626–639.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bøe, R., Magnus, C., Osmundsen, P. T., & Rindstad, B. I. (2002). CO2 point sources and subsurface storage capacities for CO2 in aquifers in Norway. Geological Survey of Norway.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Consoli, C., Higgins, K., Jorgensen, D., Khider, K., Lescinsky, D., Morris, R., & Nguyen, V. (2014). Regional assessment of the CO2 storage potential of the Mesozoic succession in the Petrel Sub-basin, Northern Territory, Australia. Australian Government.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Gorecki, C. D., Ayash, S. C., Liu, G., Braunberger, J. R., & Dotzenrod, N. W. (2015). A comparison of volumetric and dynamic CO2 storage resource and efficiency in deep saline formations. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control43, 213–225.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202573048
Loading
Seismic Attribute-Driven Analysis of Capacity Coefficient (CC) for Basin-Scale CO2 Storage: A Case Study from the Gulf of Thailand
Conference Proceedings 2025, 1 (2025); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202573048
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202573048
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202573048
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error