1887

Abstract

Summary

Distributed Fiber Optic Sensing (DFOS) technologies are transforming infrastructure monitoring by providing continuous, high-resolution data through techniques such as Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) and Distributed Temperature Sensing (DTS). These systems enhance real-time assessment of structural integrity, operational performance, and environmental conditions in both offshore and onshore applications. Beyond asset protection, DFOS also serves as a powerful tool for geoscience, enabling seismic monitoring and subsurface analysis in previously inaccessible areas. A key advantage of DFOS is its ability to generate valuable geoscience data alongside infrastructure monitoring. Fiber networks originally installed for communications and operational needs can also serve as seismic sensors, providing insights into subsurface dynamics, seismic events, and environmental changes in areas that were previously difficult to monitor. By repurposing fiber networks for sensing, DFOS enables a cost-effective expansion of geophysical data collection while enhancing infrastructure resilience.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202574005
2025-07-03
2026-02-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baba, S., Araki, E., Yamamoto, Y., Hori, T., Fujie, G., Nakamura, Y., Yokobiki, T., Matsumoto, H. (2023), “Observation of Shallow Slow Earthquakes by Distributed Acoustic Sensing Using Offshore Fiber-Optic Cable in the Nankai Trough, Southwest Japan”, Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 50, Issue 12, e2022GL102678.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Katakami, S., Noda, S., Korenaga, M., Araki, E., Takahashi, N., Iwata, N. (2024), “Potential of earthquake strong motion observation utilizing a linear estimation method for phase cycle skipping in distributed acoustic sensing”, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 129, e2023JB027327.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Urmantseva, L., Zapf, D., Drapp, B., Sennhenn, T. (2023), “Railway communication lines as a network for earthquake monitoring and near-surface characterization - a case study”, XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) (Berlin 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Valishin, O. (2023), “Innovative geophysical investigations of railroad infrastructure using discrete sensors and fiber optics”, 84th EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Viens, L., Perton, M., Spica, Z., Nishida, K., Yamada, T., Shinohara, M. (2023), “Understanding surface wave modal content for high-resolution imaging of submarine sediments with distributed acoustic sensing”, Geophysical Journal International, Volume 232, Issue 3, pages 1668–1683.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Vivin, L., Vulpe, C., McNab, L., Fourie, A., Boshoff, J., Lester, N., Cai, C., Allemand, T., Lepine, J., Bardainne, T. ( 2024), “Ambient seismic noise imaging for tailing storage facilities monitoring: a benchmark between accelerometers and DAS”, 7th International Conference on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization - Barcelona, Spain.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202574005
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202574005
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error