1887

Abstract

Summary

Cone penetration tests (CPT) provide tip resistance (qt) and sleeve friction (fs) profiles for pile design, but data are often sparse due to cost and access, creating uncertainty at untested locations. This study proposes a novel ML-based method for CPT probabilistic prediction at untested locations in layered grounds, incorporating CPT and soil type profiles. The method consists of: 1) soil classification at CPT locations with no borehole data available, 2) stratigraphy interpolation in between CPT locations, and 3) CPT probabilistic predictions for pile capacity evaluation using spatial coordinates and soil type as inputs. Simulated qt and fs data were generated using Random Field with five soil types and a defined correlation structure. Results showed that including soil type in addition to coordinates improved prediction accuracy for both qt and fs, with higher R² and lower errors compared to the coordinate-only model. Using the distribution of predicted CPT, the Unified CPT-based axial pile capacity method was applied to an assumed closed-ended pile, showing ∼30% reduction in CoV and ∼60% reduction in error at several untested locations. Overall, findings from simulated data indicate the potential of this ML-based approach; however, further validation is needed using real-world field measurements.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202575014
2025-10-15
2026-01-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine learning, 45(1), 5–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Geurts, P., Ernst, D., & Wehenkel, L. (2006). Extremely randomized trees. Machine learning, 3–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Lehane, B.M. et al. (2022). New CPT methods for axial capacity of driven piles. CPT’22, CRC Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Vanmarcke, E.H. (1983). Random fields – analysis and synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Xie et al. (2022). Generic framework for geotechnical subsurface modeling with ML. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng., 14(5), 1366–1379.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202575014
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202575014
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error