1887

Abstract

Summary

Accurate prediction of elastic and petrophysical properties is essential for reducing exploration risk and guiding reservoir development. Conventional seismic inversion workflows remain limited by assumptions on wavelets, background models, and geological contrast, often producing uncertain results in stratigraphically complex settings.

We present a stratigraphy-guided deep learning (SGDL) workflow that directly predicts impedance and porosity volumes from seismic and well data, while embedding automatically generated Relative Geological Time (RGT) and horizons. The case study is the Poseidon field in the Browse Basin, offshore northwestern Australia. The main reservoir is the Jurassic Plover Formation, a fluvio-deltaic system characterized by lateral heterogeneity due to synrift faulting, sealed by the Montara Formation.

Applied to Poseidon, the SGDL approach achieved >90% average correlation with measured logs and >80% in blind wells, compared with ∼60% for simultaneous inversion. Automatically generated horizons and RGT halved prediction error from 10% to 5%, resolving thin, high-porosity sands that inversion blurred. Predictions aligned with known gas-charged facies and Bayesian inversion results. Compared with recent AI benchmarks, the workflow delivered property volumes 44× faster while improving accuracy.

This end-to-end workflow demonstrates robust, efficient reservoir characterization with strong potential for CCS and geothermal applications.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202576033
2025-11-10
2026-02-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adeyosfi, M. M., & Harris, A. (2021). Bayesian theorem application to model reservoir facies distribution on deltaic depositional environment, case study of Browse Basin. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019, 012083. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742–6596/2019/1/012083
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ConocoPhillips (Browse Basin) Pty Ltd (2009). Kronos-1 Well Completion Report.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dixit, A., & Mandal, A. (2024). Seismic absolute acoustic impedance inversion using domain adversarial based transfer learning. Fourth International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy (IMAGE 2024). Society of Exploration Geophysicists and American Association of Petroleum Geologists. https://doi.org/10.1190/image2024-4099826.1
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Heir, A., Aghayev, S., Tran, C, & Molder, A. (2024). Inversion with stratigraphy-guided deep learning. Geophysics, 89(4), R377–R386. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2023-0586.1
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Sihotang, S. M., & Herawati, I. (2021). Simultaneous seismic inversion for reservoir characterization at Poseidon Field, Browse Basin, Australia. Al-Fiziya: Journal of Materials Science, Geophysics, Instrumentation and Theoretical Physics, 4(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.15408/fiziya.v4i1.19782
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202576033
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202576033
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error