1887

Abstract

Summary

Carbonate reservoirs in the Central Luconia field, Sarawak, Malaysia, present considerable challenges due to their heterogeneity and complex pore systems, which complicate reservoir characterization and hydrocarbon recovery. Traditional log-based methods often fail to accurately represent lithofacies variation and pore structure, resulting in discrepancies in dynamic reservoir models. To address these limitations, this research introduces a machine learning (ML)-based approach to enhance rock type classification and permeability estimation.

The proposed methodology follows a three-step workflow. First, rock type classification is performed using lithofacies, depositional facies, and Hydraulic Flow Unit (HFU) approaches. These are derived from capillary pressure data and analyzed using Rock Quality Index (RQI) and Flow Zone Indicator (FZI) methods. Next, well log data are classified into electrofacies using the Self-Organizing Map (SOM) algorithm, with refinement via core-calibrated supervised learning and Multi-Graph Based Clustering (MRGC) to optimize accuracy. Finally, permeability prediction is conducted using lithofacies-based and HFU-based models, integrating key reservoir parameters.

This methodology is applied to the field of carbonate reservoir. The study compares the effectiveness of the three classification schemes in predicting permeability, validated against core data. The results aim to provide insights into the capability of each method in capturing reservoir heterogeneity and improving subsurface model reliability.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202577014
2025-11-18
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Janjuhah, H. T., Salim, M. A., Ali, Y., Ghosh, D. P., Hassan, H. A. (2017). Development of Carbonate Buildups and Reservoir Architecture of Miocene Carbonate Platforms, Central Luconia, Offshore Sarawak, Malaysia. SPE/IATMI Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, SPE-186979-MS, DOI: 10.2118/186979‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/186979-MS [Google Scholar]
  2. Amaefule, JO, Altunbay, M., Tiab, D., Keelan, DK (1993). Enhanced reservoir description: using core and log data to identify hydraulic (flow) units and predict permeability in uncored intervals/wells. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, October 1993, 205–220., https://doi.org/10.2118/26436-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. AbouzarM., HadiS., PeymanP. (2015). Improved Method to Identify Hydraulic Flow Units for Reservoir Characterization. Energy Technology, Volume 3, Page 726–733., DOI: 10.1002/ente.201500010
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.201500010 [Google Scholar]
  4. Mohamed, S. El Sharawy., Gamal, R. G., (2019). Pore - Throat size distribution indices and their relationships with the petrophysical properties of conventional and unconventional clastic reservoirs. Marine and Petroleum Geology, Volume 99, Pages 122–134.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lee, S. H., (1999). Electrofacies Characterization and Permeability Predictions in Carbonate Reservoirs: Role of Multivariate Analysis and Nonparametric Regression. Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Mondal, L., Singh, K. H. (2022). Core-log integration and application of machine learning technique for better reservoir characterisation of Eocene carbonates, Indian offshore. Energy Geoscience, Volume 3, Page 49–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sritongthae, W., (2016). Petrophysical Rock Typing: Enhanced Permeability Prediction and Reservoir Descriptions. AAPG Geosciences Technology Workshop, Characterization of Asian Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, Bangkok, Thailand, March 31 –April 1, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202577014
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202577014
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error