1887

Abstract

Summary

This study presents a novel workflow for reservoir property modeling using generative artificial intelligence (AI), integrating Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and diffusion models to predict porosity and permeability distributions with improved resolution and uncertainty quantification. Traditional geostatistical methods often face limitations in capturing heterogeneity and thin‑bedded features, especially in data‑sparse environments. The proposed approach leverages multi‑source datasets, including well logs, core measurements, and seismic attributes, combined with physics‑informed constraints derived from seismic inversion. A conditional GAN framework generates high‑resolution three‑dimensional property cubes, while diffusion models provide multiple equiprobable realizations to account for geological uncertainty.

Results from synthetic and field‑scale case studies demonstrate significant improvements compared to conventional methods, including enhanced thin‑bed continuity, facies distribution alignment with seismic reflectors, and up to a 20% reduction in mean squared error between predicted and core‑measured porosity. This workflow provides interpretable and uncertainty‑aware reservoir models, supporting more informed decision‑making in exploration and production. The integration of generative AI with geophysical and petrophysical data highlights its potential as a transformative tool for reservoir characterization, with future scope for coupling with digital twins for real‑time adaptive reservoir management.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202577090
2025-11-18
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Mosser, L., Dubrule, O., & Blunt, M. J. (2018). Stochastic reconstruction of an oolitic limestone by generative adversarial networks. Water Resources Research, 54(10), 7625–7640.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chan, S., Elsheikh, A. H., & Garipov, T. T. (2020). Parametric generation of geological realizations using generative adversarial networks. Computational Geosciences, 24(3), 939–955.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Song, Y., & Ermon, S. (2020). Generative modeling by estimating gradients of the data distribution. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 33.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang, Y., & Curtis, A. (2021). Physics‐informed deep generative models for geophysical inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 226(1), 522–540.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202577090
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202577090
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error