1887

Abstract

Summary

The environmental impact of air-gun sources has long been debated, with a growing focus on reducing unnecessary high-frequency emissions that provide no imaging benefits. These redundant frequencies contribute to the overall sound footprint of seismic operations, prompting efforts to develop sources that minimize environmental impact while maintaining data quality fit for a survey’s objective. This is particularly relevant in regions with stringent environmental regulations, such as Brazil, where reducing high-frequency emissions can help facilitate permitting and regulatory compliance.

Seismic source selection is influenced by several factors, including survey objectives, geological conditions, and environmental considerations. Recent advancements in source technology have led to the development of bandwidth- controlled airguns, low-frequency-rich broadband sources, and marine vibrators, all of which aim to optimize seismic output while minimizing unnecessary sound emissions.

These innovations bring the industry closer to achieving the ideal seismic source - one that delivers only the necessary energy for high-quality imaging without excessive and unused out of band sound emissions. In this paper we are showcasing how some recent technological improvements perform in real-world applications and whether they effectively balance imaging requirements with environmental responsibility.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202581008
2025-05-21
2026-02-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alfaro, R., Secker, S., Zamboni, E., Cozzens, A., Henderson, N., Jenkerson, M., Nechayuk, V., Johnson, G. and Karran, J., [2023] Validation of an Alternative Seismic Source: The Integrated Projector Node Marine Vibrator Pilot Seismic Survey. 84th EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202310554
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cocker, J., Mothershaw, W., French, L. and Redfearn, S., [2023] A seismic source field trial in the Bass Strait: Testing the impact of several different source configurations on geophysical quality, received sound and direct impact on scallops and lobsters, Expanded Abstracts Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference - AEGC Brisbane 2023
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Coste, E., Gerez, D., Groenaas, H., Larsen, O. P., Wolfstirn, M., HopperstadJ., Laws, R., Norton, J. and Padula, M. [2014] Attenuated high-frequency emission from a new design of air-gun. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Jafargandomi, A., Holland, S., Howard, K., Wang, T. and Elboth, E., [2024]. Effective processing of first broadband 3D marine vibrator data acquired in the North Sea, In 84th EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Laws, R., Gerez, D., Ocampo, C., and Supawala, M., [2017] A comparison of image quality and potential environmental impact for two types of air gun. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2017-17674813.1
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Tellier, N., Large, J., Ronen, S. and Aznar, J. [2021] A new wave in marine seismic source technologyFirst Break, Volume 39, Issue 11, Nov 2021, p. 89 – 95
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Rentsch, S., Hager, E. and Wing, L. [2022] Enhanced low-frequencies in airgun arrays, a modelling and field experiment. 83rd EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Rentsch, S., Hager, E., Howard, K., Holland, S., Redfearn, S., and Wing, L. [2024] Exploring the impact of a low-frequency-rich source in three geological environments. Third EAGE Workshop on Advanced Seismic Solutions in the Gulf of Mexico
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ronen, S. and Chelminski, S. [2017]. Tuned Pulse Source - a new low frequency seismic source. 87th SEG Conference and Exhibition, expanded abstract. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2017-w16-04.1.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Udengaard, C., Brookes, D., and Flores, H. [2023]. Gemini: A fully operational broadband source for model building and imaging, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2023. https://doi.org/10.1190/image2023-3914578.1
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202581008
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202581008
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error