1887

Abstract

Summary

Since the 1970s, geothermal projects have explored ways to enhance subsurface permeability, with Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) emerging as a promising approach. Unlike conventional systems, EGS creates reservoirs by fracturing rock, offering greater flexibility and potential. While recent literature highlights EGS successes, less attention is given to failures, often rooted in inadequate subsurface understanding. Accurate characterization of subsurface properties and prediction of responses to stimulation are critical for EGS viability. One major challenge is acquiring and interpreting geophysical and well data under harsh underground conditions. In-situ stress—vital for hydraulic stimulation design and seismic risk assessment—is influenced by rock heterogeneity and scale effects, requiring high-quality data to reduce uncertainty. Robust subsurface modeling also depends on integrating historical insights, technological advances, and numerical techniques.

This paper reviews the current state of EGS characterization, emphasizing geomechanics as a key factor. It explores existing and emerging modeling techniques, challenges in applying models to real-world scenarios, and the importance of model verification. By addressing these issues, the paper aims to support more reliable engineering decisions and advance the development of EGS technologies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202586005
2025-11-12
2026-01-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BreezeP. [2022] Chapter 12 - Geothermal Power. Power Generation Technologies. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102631-1.00012-2
    [Google Scholar]
  2. DongX, GengH, HaoG, LiP, TengY, ZhangW. [2021] Numerical Simulation on Heat Recovery Efficiency of Different Working Fluids in High-Temperature Rock Mass, Geofluids, vol. 2021, Article ID 1468825, 12 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1468825
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gard, M., and Hasterok, D. [2021] A global Curie depth model utilising the equivalent source magnetic dipole method. Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors313, 106672. https://doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2021.10667
    [Google Scholar]
  4. GhassemiA. [2017] Application of rock failure simulation in design optimization of the hydraulic fracturing. Porous Rock Fracture Mechanics with Application to Hydraulic Fracturing, Drilling and Structural Engineering. Chapter 1, pp 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100781-5.00001-4
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Jolie, E., Scott, S., Faulds, J. et al. [2021] Geological controls on geothermal resources for power generation. Nat Rev Earth Environ2, 324–339. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00154-y
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Li, S. & Wang, S. & Tang, H. [2022] Stimulation mechanism and design of enhanced geothermal systems: A comprehensive review. Earth Science Reviews Vol 188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111914
    [Google Scholar]
  7. OlasoloP, JuarezM, MoralesM, LiarteI. [2016] Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS): a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2016; 56:133–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.031
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Van der MeerF, HeckerC, Van RuitenbeekF, Van der WerffH, De WijkersloothC, WechslerC. [2014] Geologic remote sensing geothermal exploration: a review. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 2014;33:255–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2014.05.007
    [Google Scholar]
  9. ZarroukS, McLeanK. [2019] Chapter 2 - Geothermal systems. Geothermal Well Test Analysis -Fundamentals, Applications and Advanced Techniques. Chapter 2, pp. 13–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814946-1.00002-5
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202586005
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202586005
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error