1887

Abstract

Summary

Most of the wells drilled on the Norwegian Continental Shelf during the last two decades are equipped with permanent gauges installed both at the wellhead and downhole. The gauges enable both on-the-fly and long-term monitoring of well performance, crucial for both the short-term optimization on the well level and the long-term reservoir management. The industry of today needs automation of the gauge data analysis and interpretation. Scalable data-driven solutions are being explored, while inheriting physics of well and reservoir flows is still crucial. This paper presents a recently developed workflow combining both pure data-driven and physics-informed methods to automate analysis and interpretation of big datasets from the permanent gauges. The workflow focuses on combination of pressure and rate data, commonly used in monitoring well performance with time-lapse pressure transient analysis, although many methods may be applied to other datasets such as temperature measurements or even other industries where transient behavior of measurements is observed. We concentrate further on the value of integrating data-driven approaches with physics-informed proxy-metrics for monitoring the well and reservoir performances. The paper concludes with the current and potential application areas of the methods developed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202639008
2026-03-09
2026-02-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allain, O., & Horne, R. (1990). Use of Artificial Intelligence in Well-Test Interpretation (SPE-18160). Journal of Petroleum Technology, 42(03), 342–349. https://doi.org/10.2118/18160-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cui, B., Shchipanov, A., Demyanov, V., Zhang, N., & Rong, C. (2025). New Transient Identification Methods for Automated Pre-Processing of Pressure Measurements with Permanent Well Gauges. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5211292
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Olsen, S., & Nordtvedt, J. (2006). Experience from the Use of Automatic Well-Test Analysis (SPE-102920). SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 24–27 September. San Antonio, Texas: SPE. https://doi.org/10.2118/102920-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Shchipanov, A., Berenblyum, R., & Kollbotn, L. (2014). Pressure Transient Analysis as an Element of Permanent Reservoir Monitoring (SPE-170740). SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 27–29 October. https://doi.org/10.2118/170740-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Shchipanov, A., Kollbotn, L., & Namazova, G. (2023). PTA-metrics for time-lapse analysis of well performance. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology (13), 1591–1609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-023-01631-4
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Shchipanov, A., Cui, B., Starikov, V., Muradov, K., Khrulenko, A., Zhang, N., & Demyanov, V. (2024). A New Automated Workflow for Well Monitoring Using Permanent Pressure and Rate Measurements (SPE-218470). SPE Norway Subsurface Conference. Bergen, Norway: SPE. https://doi.org/10.2118/218470-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Starikov, V., Shchipanov, A., Demyanov, V., & Muradov, K. (2024). Feature extraction and pattern recognition in time-lapse pressure transient responses. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 242, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213160
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Suzuki, S. (2018). Using Similarity-Based Pattern Detection to Automate Pressure Transient Analysis (SPE-193285). Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Conference & Exhibition, 12–15 November. Abu Dhabi, UAE: SPE. https://doi.org/10.2118/193285-MS
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202639008
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202639008
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error