1887

Abstract

Summary

Depth-domain interpretation of seismic data enhances geological realism but remains affected by uncertainties in velocity models and incomplete well integration. Even with accurate seismic-to-well ties, persistent depth mismatches between migrated seismic horizons and well markers can undermine the reliability of reservoir models and volumetric estimates. To address this issue, we present an automated workflow that vertically adjusts a three-dimensional (3D) Relative Geological Time (RGT) model to well markers. Unlike conventional approaches that adjust individual horizons independently, our method simultaneously calibrates all horizons using a non-rigid vertical deformation derived from radial basis function interpolation of measured depth offsets. This mesh-free technique ensures comprehensive well calibration for any interpreted 3D object (e.g., stratal slices, horizons, geobodies, or fault sets), preserving consistency across seismic, well, and derived property data. We demonstrate the workflow on the K05 3D seismic dataset (offshore Netherlands). Compared to traditional horizon-by-horizon fitting, the global RGT adjustment eliminates local thickness artifacts and slightly increases gross rock volume estimates. By applying a single global deformation, the method minimizes inconsistencies when integrating multi-source data, improving the quality of property models. Supported by rigorous seismic and well interpretations, this approach ensures consistent layer thicknesses and enhanced depth predictions, ultimately refining reservoir characterization.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202639029
2026-03-09
2026-02-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bulhoes, F.C., Ferreira, G.D. and Caparica Jr., J.F [2018] Impacts of seismic velocity model calibration for time-depth conversion: a case study. Brazilian Journal of Geophysics, 36(4), 401–410.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Daynac, N. [2024] Emphasis of high order stratigraphic sequences enabled by the relative geological time modelling method: application to fractured thin reservoirs in a pre-salt gas field, offshore Netherlands. International Petroleum Technology Conference, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, 12 February 2024. Paper number: IPTC-23254-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Daynac, N., Lacaze, S. and Pauget, F. [2016] Interpretation of complex faulted deposits in the North Sea using the relative geological time model. First Break, 34(5).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Geiss, B. [2008] Late charge problems in the K5 area. EBN & TNO Rifting Workshop, 5 June 2008 (Abstract).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Geluk, M.C. [2005] Stratigraphy and tectonics of Permo-Triassic basins in the Netherlands and surrounding areas. Ph.D. thesis, Utrecht University.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Pauget, F., Lacaze, S. and Valding, T. [2009] A global approach in seismic interpretation based on cost function minimization. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2009. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Philit, S., Souche, L. and Collet, M. [2025] Stochastic prospect assessment workflow - example of the Poseidon case study. In: 86th EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 1–5 (Extended abstract).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Reilly, J.M. [1993] Integration of well and seismic data for 3D velocity model building. First Break, 11(6).
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202639029
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202639029
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error