1887

Abstract

Summary

Reservoir modeling involves multiple uncertainty sources, and their integration is both challenging and critical for subsurface operations. Thus, we propose a method and the corresponding digital framework to rapidly build confidence maps in reservoir models. These confidence maps help to understand how uncertainties are spatially distributed and to appraise risks in specific areas.

Our approach leverages Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) techniques to combine user-controlled and knowledge-based inputs with a standardized numerical process. This multiple-criteria integration relies on a knowledge graph that formalizes the list of uncertain components and their relationships. Each component is then assessed to generate an uncertainty index and a map, using simple data-driven recipes. Finally, these maps and indices are aggregated in a single confidence map, with a knowledge-based procedure. This aggregation exploits the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), an MCDA technique consisting in pairwise comparisons with a predefined scale.

In a concrete case study, we apply this method to map the confidence associated with the Gross Rock Volume (GRV) of a subsurface reservoir, integrating uncertainties from seismic data, well markers, well-to-seismic tie, velocity models and interpreted horizons. This example illustrates the consistency of the output as well as the efficiency and versality of the digital framework.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202639048
2026-03-09
2026-02-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akinlalu, A. A., Afolabi, D. O., & Sanusi, S. O. [2024]. Knowledge-driven fuzzy AHP model for orogenic gold prospecting in a typical schist belt environment: a mineral system approach. Earth Systems and Environment, 8, 221–263.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bouquet, S., & Fornel, A. [2020]. Geoengineering Tool for Field Development: A Decision-Making Tool for Deviated Well Placement. In ECMOR XVII
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ma, X. [2022]. Knowledge graph construction and application in geosciences: A review. Computers & Geosciences, 161, 105082.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ma, Y. Z. [2010]. Error types in reservoir characterization and management. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 72, (3–4), 290–301.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ma, Y. Z. [2011]. Uncertainty analysis in reservoir characterization and management: How much should we know about what we don’t know?. in Uncertainty analysis and reservoir modeling, AAPG Memoir 96, 1–15
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Saaty, T.L. & Vargas, L.G. [2022]. Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, second edition. Springer, 345 p.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Uusitalo, L., Lehikoinen, A., Helle, I. et al. [2015]. An overview of methods to evaluate uncertainty of deterministic models in decision support. Environmental Modelling & Software, 63, 24–31.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202639048
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202639048
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error