1887

Abstract

Summary

This study applied a Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) framework to optimize maintenance intervals for reactor overpressure protection systems, effectively overcoming the limitations of traditional deterministic methods, which do not account for uncertainties in component failure rates. The investigated protection system consists of two parallel subsystems—an alarm system (pressure switch + alarm indicator) and a shutdown system (pressure switch + solenoid valve)—designed to ensure safe operation under overpressure conditions. Using a probabilistic approach, the traditional method estimated the maintenance interval at 13.7 years; however, when uncertainties in each component’s failure rate were incorporated through MCS, the analysis indicated that health checks should be performed at least every 9.5 years. This shorter, risk-informed interval better reflects real-world variability, ensuring the probability of failure on demand remains within acceptable safety limits while maintaining operational efficiency.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202639052
2026-03-09
2026-02-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Metropolis, N., & Ulam, S. (1949). The Monte Carlo method. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 44(247), 335–341.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Rausand, M., & Hoyland, A. (2004). System reliability theory: models, statistical methods, and applications (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Vaurio, J. K. (1995). Optimization of test and maintenance intervals based on risk and cost. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 49(1), 23–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Marseguerra, M., Zio, E., & Podofillini, L. (2002). Condition-based maintenance optimization by means of genetic algorithms and Monte Carlo simulation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 77(2), 151–166.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. International Atomic Energy Agency (2008). Application of Reliability Centred Maintenance to Optimize Operation and Maintenance in Nuclear Power Plants. IAEA-TECDOC-1590, Vienna.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Zio, E. (2007). An introduction to the basics of reliability and risk analysis. World Scientific Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Borgonovo, E., & Apostolakis, G. E. (2001). A new importance measure for risk-informed decision making. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 72(2), 193–212.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Daniel A.Crowl & Joseph F.Louvar. Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications, Chapter 12, “Risk Assessment”, Example 12–2 on the reactor alarm & shutdown reliability.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202639052
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202639052
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error