1887

Abstract

Summary

Petrographic thin sections provide critical insights into rock microstructures, especially pore spaces that control fluid flow, storage, and reservoir quality in sandstones and carbonates. Manual analysis is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and prone to bias, limiting its scalability for large datasets. Advances in digital imaging and computational methods have enabled automated approaches that improve efficiency and reproducibility.

This study presents an automated system for pore segmentation and classification. It uses a hybrid approach: color-based thresholding for epoxy-dyed images and an Attention U-Net deep learning model for non-dyed or complex cases. The system extracts topological metrics, including pore size distribution, aspect ratios, and solidity, to classify pores into interparticle, vuggy, and fracture types, aiding understanding of pore connectivity and reservoir performance.

Building on previous work in image processing and deep learning, the system integrates hybrid detection, quality verification, and exportable metrics in Excel, making it accessible to geologists without programming expertise. Unlike methods that focus solely on segmentation, this tool adapts to dyed and non-dyed images while providing topological classification. Tested on real datasets, it achieves accuracy comparable to manual analysis while drastically reducing processing time, offering a scalable and user-friendly solution for modern petrographic studies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202639091
2026-03-09
2026-02-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Grove, C., & Jerram, D. A. (2011). jPOR: An ImageJ macro to quantify total optical porosity from blue-stained thin sections. Computers & Geosciences, 37(11), 1850–1859.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anselmetti, F. S., Luthi, S., & Eberli, G. P. (1998). Quantitative characterization of carbonate pore systems by digital image analysis. AAPG Bulletin, 82(10), 1815–1836.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Karimpouli, S., & Tahmasebi, P. (2020). Segmentation of digital rock images using U-Net. Computers & Geosciences, 143, 104567.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang, Y. et al., (2024). An Object-Based Approach to Differentiate Pores and Microfractures in Thin Sections. Earth and Space Science, 11(2).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Jiang, F. et al., (2023). High-precision algorithm for grain segmentation of thin sections. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 93(12), 932–945.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ansari, M. et al., (2024). Porosity classification from thin sections using image analysis. Journal of Mining and Environment.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, Y. et al., (2023). Deep learning image segmentation for the reliable porosity measurement. Journal of Analytical Science and Technology, 14, 52.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Almaskari, M. et al., (2025). Development of an Automated Thin Section Image Analysis Using Machine Learning. Search and Discovery, Article #91209.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Godec, A. et al., (2022). Superpixel segmentations for thin sections: Evaluation of methods to enable the generation of large labeled data sets for image segmentation. Computers & Geosciences, 158, 104966.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202639091
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202639091
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error