1887

Abstract

Summary

In recent decades, Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) has revolutionized the way numerous technologies, such as the oil and gas industries, have transitioned to provide sustainable solutions to reduce carbon emissions. This issue is of importance in relation to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In this study, we propose a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework to assess and compare the key criteria for selecting CCUS technologies. We proposed the technique of order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to rank CCUS technologies based on different criteria. Therefore, it was concluded that Cryogenic technology can be an essential technique among others, while in the TOPSIS method, Adsorption and Absorption technology ranked first.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2026648004
2026-01-27
2026-02-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Lirong, D.O.U., Longde, S.U.N., Weifeng, L.Y.U., Mingyuan, W.A.N.G., Feng, G.A.O. and Ming, G.A.O., 2023. Trend of global carbon dioxide capture, utilization and storage industry and challenges and countermeasures in China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 50(5), pp.1246–1260.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Derse, O., 2023. CO2 capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) storage site selection using DEMATEL-based Grey Relational Analysis and evaluation of carbon emissions with the ARIMA method. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(6), pp.14353–14364.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Storrs, K.D.P., Lyhne, I. and Drustrup, R., 2023. A comprehensive framework for feasibility of CCUS deployment: a meta-review of literature on factors impacting CCUS deployment. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 125, p.103878.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dziejarski, B., Krzyżyńska, R. and Andersson, K., 2023. Current status of carbon capture, utilization, and storage technologies in the global economy: A survey of technical assessment. Fuel, 342, p.127776.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hu, X., Xie, J., Yan, A., Chen, Z., Li, Y., Zhai, P. and Davarpanah, A., 2025. Evaluating the potential of depleted gas reservoirs for carbon storage: A comprehensive fuzzy DEMATEL assessment of influential factors. Fuel, 393, p.134986.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Saaty, T.L., 2003. Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European journal of operational research, 145(1), pp.85–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Çelikbilek, Y. and Tüysüz, F., 2020. An in-depth review of theory of the TOPSIS method: An experimental analysis. Journal of Management Analytics, 7(2), pp.281–300.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2026648004
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2026648004
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error