1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Near Surface Geophysics
  4. Volume 7, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 7 Number 2
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

A high‐resolution, ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) investigation was performed on existing commercial shop premises within The Rows, Chester, UK to detect near‐surface features, including a suspected Medieval undercroft (cellar), the location of which was unknown. GPR 2D profiles were acquired on a 0.5 m square grid‐pattern both within the premises and on an exterior, Medieval raised walkway. Multi‐frequency (250, 500 and 800 MHz dominant frequency) repeat‐surveys were acquired in selected areas over the grid to resolve progressively deeper near‐surface structures and used to generate 500 and 800 MHz horizontal ‘time‐slices’.

Floor‐supporting wooden beams with steel supports on the exterior walkway, the Medieval undercroft, associated passageways and a hitherto unexpected access trap‐door were all successfully located. The undercroft was found to be air‐filled. Three near‐surface rectangular areas were identified and found not to be associated with the undercroft; these were interpreted to represent heterogeneous, rubble back‐fill. Separate, isolated, raised areas were also identified ~1.5 m below present floor level; these were interpreted as relict brick column supports from a long‐demolished, Roman building. GPR data acquired on the exterior raised walkway also found evidence for relict support structures from a former shopfront.

All of the targeted anomalies were intrusively investigated and provided positive confirmation of the geophysical interpretations. Archaeological investigations of trial pits confirmed the site’s varied history and depth to bedrock. GPR was therefore effective in this study to locate and characterize the modern, Medieval and Roman features without extensive intrusive investigation, whilst causing minimal disruption to commercial operations. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of carefully acquired and processed, high‐resolution, closely‐spaced GPR survey data in near‐surface characterization for geotechnical investigations.

© European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers © 2009 European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2008042
2008-12-01
2024-04-28

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2008042
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AbbasA.M., KameiH., HelalA., AtyaM.A. and ShabbanF.A.2005. Contribution of geophysics to outlining the foundation structure of the Islamic museum, Cairo, Egypt. Archaeological Prospection12, 167–176.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. BishopI. and KoorN.P.2000. Integrated geophysical and geotechnical investigations of old masonry retaining walls in Hong Kong. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology & Hydrology33, 335–349.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. ChavezR.E., CamaraM.E., PonceR. and ArgoteD.2005. Use of geophysical methods in urban archaeological prospection: The Basilica de Nuestra Senora de la Salud, Patzcuaro, Mexico. Geoarchaeology20, 505–519.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. DavisJ.L. and AnnanA.P.1989. Ground‐penetrating radar for high‐resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy. Geophysical Prospecting37, 531–551.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. GrandjeanG., GourryJ.C. and BitriA.2000. Evaluation of GPR techniques for civil‐engineering applications: study on a test site. Journal of Applied Geophysics45, 141–156.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. GrenvilleJ.1990. The Rows of Chester: some thoughts on the results of recent research. World Archaeology21, 446–460.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. GustafssonJ. and AlkarpM.2007. Array GPR investigation of the cathedral of Uppsala. Near Surface Geophysics5, 203–207.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. KutrubesD.L. and MaserK.1998. Use of GPR in 2D and 3D imaging of bridge footings and scour studies.Proceedings of Symposium for the Applications of Geophysics to Environmental and Engineering Problems, March 1998, Chicago, IL, 893–902.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. LewisC.P. and ThackerA.T.2003. A History of the County of Chester, Volume 5, part 1. Boydell & Brewer Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. McDowellP.W. and WorkingParty. 2002. Geophysics in Engineering Investigations.Geological Society of London, Engineering Geology & CIRIA Special Publication, 19.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. NegriS. and LeucciG.2006. Geophysical investigation of the Temple of Apollo (Hierapolis, Turkey). Journal of Archaeological Science33, 1505–1513.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. NicolD. and ReynoldsJ.M.2001. Ground‐Penetrating Radar survey to detect sub‐slab voids beneath the East Promenade at Rhyl. Water and Maritime Engineering148, 47–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. PringleJ.K., StimpsonI.G., ToonS.M., CauntS., LaneV.S., HusbandC.R. et al. 2008. Geophysical characterisation of derelict coalmine workings and mineshaft detection: A case study from Shrewsbury, UK. Near Surface Geophysics6, 185–194.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. ReynoldsJ.M.1997. Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. RizzoE., ChianeseD. and LapennaV.2005. Magnetic, GPR and geoelectrial measurements for studying the archaeological site of ‘Masseria Nigro’ (Viggiano, southern Italy). Near Surface Geophysics3, 13–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. SchofieldJ. and VinceA.2005. The Archaeology of British Towns in Their European Setting(The archaeology of Medieval Europe 1100‐1600), 2nd edn. Continuum Press, New York.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. SerenS., Eder‐HinterleitnerA., NeubauerW. and GrohS.2004. Combined high‐resolution magnetic and GPR surveys of the Roman town of Flavia Solva. Near Surface Geophysics2, 63–68.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2008042
Loading
GPR investigations to characterize Medieval and Roman foundations under existing shop premises: a case study from Chester, Cheshire, UK
Near Surface Geophysics 7, 93 (2009); https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2008042
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2008042
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2008042
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error