Comparison between 2D and 3D ERT inversion for engineering site investigations – a case study from Oslo Harbour

References

1. Batlle‐AguilarJ., SchneiderS., PesselM., TucholkaP., CoquetY. and VachierP.2009. Axisymetrical infiltration in soil imaged by noninvasive electrical resistivimetry. Soil Science Society of America Journal73(2), 510–520.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BazinS., ReisersenK., AnschützH., LatoM.J. and PfaffhuberA.A.2012. The use of electrical resistivity tomography for an archaeological investigation in the Old Oslo Harbor, Norway. In: Near Surface Geoscience2012.
   [Google Scholar]
3. ConstableS.C., ParkerR.L. and ConstableC.G.1987. Occam’s inversion: a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromAgnetic sounding data. Geophysics52(3), 289–300.
   [Google Scholar]
4. DahlinT. and Zhou, B. 2006. Multiple gradient array measurements for multi‐channel 2D resistivity imaging. Near Surface Geophysics4, 213–223.
   [Google Scholar]
5. EllisR.G. and OldenburgD.W.1993. Applied geophysical inversion. International Journal of Geophysics116, 5–11.
   [Google Scholar]
6. FarquharsonC.G. and OldenburgD.W.1998. Non‐linear inversion using general measures of data misfit and model structure. International Journal of Geophysics134, 213–227.
   [Google Scholar]
7. N.Günsenin
   GundersenJ.2012. Barcode Project: Fifteen Nordic Clinker‐Built Boats from the 16th and 17th Centuries in the City Centre of Oslo, Norway. In: Proceedings of the 12th Symposium on Boat and Ship Archaeology, Istanbul, Turkey, 2009 (ed. N.Günsenin ), pp. 75–80.
   [Google Scholar]
8. GüntherT., RückerC. and SpitzerK.2006. Three‐dimensional modelling and inversion of dc resistivity data incorporating topography—II. Inversion. International Journal of Geophysics166, 506–517.
   [Google Scholar]
9. KjelstrupY.1962. Oslo havns historie for tidsrommet inntil 1954. Oslo Havnevesen, Oslo.
   [Google Scholar]
10. LokeM.H., AcworthI. and DahlinT.2003. A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys. Exploration Geophysics34, 182–187.
    [Google Scholar]
11. MolaugP.2002. Oslo havn i middelalderen. NIKU strategisk instituttprogram 1996‐2001 Norske middelalderbyer.NIKU Publikasjoner122, 1–59 (in Norwegian).
    [Google Scholar]
12. MolaugP.2012. Oslo havn før 1624.Viking75, 211–236 (in Norwegian).
    [Google Scholar]
13. PalackyG.J.1987. Resistivity characteristics of geologic targets. Geosciences Journal3, 138–144.
    [Google Scholar]
14. PfaffhuberA.2012. Geofysisk kartlegging av risiko for kulturminner ifm. prosjektering av nye Dronning Eufemias Gate. Fjellsprengningsteknikk Bergmekanikk/Geoteknikk2012, 33.1–33.8 (in Norwegian).
    [Google Scholar]
15. RømoenM., PfaffhuberA.A., KarlsrudK. and HelleT.E.2010. Resistivity on marine sediments retrieved from RCPTU soundings: a Norwegian case study. In: International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, Vol. 2, Huntington Beach, CA, pp. 289–304.
    [Google Scholar]
16. SharmaS.K., ShuklaS.R. and KamalaB.S.1997. Studies on DC electrical resistivity of plantation grown timbers. Holz als Roh‐ und Werkstoff55, 391–394.
    [Google Scholar]
17. T.E.Fagerland
    VangstadH.2011. De siste års arkeologiske funn i Bjørvika fra perioden 1570 til 2000—lange linjer, lyktige episoder. In: 1537 ‐ Kontinuitet eller brudd? (utg. T.E.Fagerland og K.Paasche ), pp. 135–150 (in Norwegian).
    [Google Scholar]
18. N.Günsenin
    VangstadH.2012. Development of an adaptive method for the rescue of 15 shipwrecks from a construction site in Oslo Harbour: need for speed. In: Proceedings of the 12th Symposium on Boat and Ship Archaeology, Istanbul, Turkey, 2009 (ed. N.Günsenin ), pp. 305–312.
    [Google Scholar]
19. E.S.Koren
    VangstadH.2014. Bjørvika—et amfibiearkeologisk eldorado. In: Hundre år Over og Under Vann (utg. E.S.Koren og F.Kvalø ), pp. 295–323 (in Norwegian).
    [Google Scholar]