1887

Abstract

The work had as objective the water table mapping with GPR (Ground Penetrating Radar) method, and seismic refraction with a comparative analysis between both results, once both answers to the presence of interstitial water of vadosa zone are distinct. Geophysical data were acquired in São Paulo city, in<br>Brazil. Both methods revealed uncertainties in the determination of water table, but for the studied case, the most common errors were associated to the results of seismic refraction due to the uncertainty in the seismic wave velocity determination in the first layer. Considering the studied case, we find out the integration of the worked methods, always possible, can give rise to decrease related to inversion ambiguities of the data, and contribute to better accuracy in water table mapping.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.160.SBGF165
2005-09-11
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.160.SBGF165
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error