1887

Abstract

Kirchhoff migration has traditionally been the leading implementation for application of depth<br>migration to seismic data. There are many reasons for this, such as efficiency, ability to image steep and even<br>overhanging dips, and flexibility. In most parts of the world Kirchhoff migration produces images that are as<br>good as, or better, than the more expensive implementations using downward continuation algorithms.<br>However, the limitations of Kirchhoff migration are well known and its inability to image more than a single<br>arrival is the most damaging. Downward continuation algorithms, on the other hand, handle all arrivals but<br>their inability to image steep dips is a severe limitation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.254.GP09
2009-03-01
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.254.GP09
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error