1887
  1. Home
  2. Conferences
  3. Conference Proceedings
  4. 1st Latin American Geosciences Student Conference (LAGSC)
  5. Conference paper

Abstract

Summary

Simultaneous source technique has been attracting more and more attention becasue of its intuitive benefit in largely improving acquistion efficiency and somewhat resulting in higher record quality. However, the intense crosstalk between two or more sources lays a challenge for the processing afterwards, which calls for more specific and robust processing methods. In this paper, we introduce a new iteration based estimation scheme for the separation of the blended seismic data. We first construct a common estimation problem, then we use shaping regularization to constrain the model when iteratively solving the problem. In our method, we use soft thresholding in the seislet domain as our shaper to remove crosstalk noise and at the same time preserve the useful dip components in the seismic data. We use a numerically blended complex synthetic example to demostrate the performance of the proposed algorithm.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201317880
2013-04-08
2024-04-26

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201317880
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Beasley, C.J., Dragoset, B. and Salama, A.
    [2012] A 3d simultaneous source field test processed using alternating projections: a new active separation method. Geophysical Prospecting, 60, 591–601.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Berkhout, A.J.
    [2008] Changing the mindset in seismic data acquisition. The Leading Edge, 27, 924–938.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Borselen, R.V., Baardman, R., Martin, T., Goswami, B. and Fromyr, E.
    [2012] An inversion approach to separating sources in marine simultaneous shooting acquision-application to a gulf of mexico data set. Geophysical Prospecting, 60, 640–647.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Doulgeris, P., Bube, K., Hampson, G. and Blacquiere, G.
    [2012] Covergence analysis of a coherency-constrained inversion for the separation of blended data. Geophysical Prospecting, 60, 769–781.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Fomel, S. and Liu, Y.
    [2010] Seislet transform and seislet frame. Geophysics, 75, V25–V38.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Fomel, S.
    [2002] Application of plane-wave destruction filters. Geophysics, 67, 1946–1960.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. [2005] Shapping regularization in geophysical estimation problems. SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1673–1676.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. [2007] Shaping regularization in geophysical-estimation problems. Geophysics, 72, R29–R36.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. [2008] Nonlinear shapping regularization in geophysical inverse problems. SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2046–2051.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Mahdad, A., Doulgeris, P. and Blacquiere, G.
    [2012] Iterative method for the separation of blended seismic data: discussion on the algorithmic aspects. Geophysical Prospecting, 60, 782–801.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Tikhonov, A.N.
    [1963] Solution of incorrectly formulated problems and the regularization method. Soviet Mathematics Doklady, 1035–1038.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201317880
Loading
Iteratively Separating the Simultaneous Seismic Data
Conference Proceedings 2013, 1 (2013); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201317880
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201317880
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201317880
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error