1887

Abstract

Summary

Common-offset vector (COV) data have served industry well for survey design, generating well-sampled datasets for noise suppression, offset and azimuth analyses and inversion, and image improvements. For P-waves acquired on a flat recording surface, the basic cross-spread theory assumes that reflection-points (RPs) occur below common mid-points (CMPs). This assumption is ray-based, for 3D propagation in isotropic laterally homogeneous media. However, converted P- to S-waves (PS-waves) and other geometries violate this theory because of their asymmetric ray paths. In this paper I apply a general ray-based theory to define COV illumination area for both P- and PS-waves of various geometries. This involves a first-order approximation in ray-parameter, <i>p</i>, of reflection-point (RP) position as a function of <i>t</i><sub>0</sub><i>V</i><sup>2</sup> terms: vertical traveltime and NMO velocity. This definition facilitates corrections to improve RP consistency within a COV gather or volume. I describe corrections applied to offset-vector tile (OVT) distortion for conventional land orthogonal cross-spread data, and for marine geometries of ocean-bottom cable and node (OBC and OBN) geometries where source and receiver have a different datum. Also, I show that this theory can be applied to illumination distortion from structure (plane dipping layers) and discuss corrections for COV data in the context of migration.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140646
2014-06-16
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bale, R., T.Marchand, K.Wilkinson and J.Deere
    [2013] The design and application of converted-wave COVs. CSEG GeoConvention, Exbanded Abstract, 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cary, P.W.
    [1999] Common-offset-vector gathers: an alternative to cross-spreads for wide-azimuth 3D surveys. 69th Ann. Int. Conf. and Exhib. SEG, Expanded Abstract, 1496–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chung, W.Y. and D.Corrigan
    [1985] Gathering mode-converted shear waves: a model study. 45th Int. Conf. and Exhib. SEG, Expanded AbstractS18.7, 602–604.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Stewart, R. and J.Gaiser
    [2011] Application and interpretation of converted waves. SEG Continuing Education course.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Thomsen, L.
    [1999] Converted-wave reflection seismology over inhomogeneous, anisotropic media. Geophysics64, 678–690.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Vermeer, G.J.O.
    [2002] 3-D seismic survey design. Society of Exploration Geophysics, Geophysical References 12.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140646
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140646
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error