1887

Abstract

Summary

Sparse seafloor seismic acquisitions present new challenges when processing and imaging converted wave (PS-wave) data. The severe anti-symmetric nature of PS-wave reflections for deepwater acquisitions, and the strong aliasing and low fold derived from sparse shot or receiver arrays, necessitate the solution of significant practical problems to achieve high-quality seismic images near the seafloor. The problems of PS-wave imaging with deep-water, sparse ocean-bottom receiver arrays (OBN or OBC) has motivated new investigation and led to interesting results.

For sparse acquisition geometries, wavefield aliasing is more acute when processing in some domains than others. For example, shot-carpet acquisitions recorded with sparse ocean-bottom nodes are well sampled in the common-receiver (CR) domain but poorly sampled in the common shot (CS) domain. Migration of these data is more attractive in the CR domain, in which the process of anti-aliasing during migration may be more effectively carried out than in the CS domain. Nevertheless, the summation of all the migrated CR wavefields still suffers from aliasing caused by the large receiver spacing. Further, low S-wave velocities are responsible for narrow illumination cones for all the CR migrated images, and the coarse receiver spacing cannot “heal” these images to produce a coherent stacked image near the seafloor. Here we propose some practical solutions to mitigate the effects of receiver spacing. We use Gaussian beam migration (GBM) to track surface ray parameters into the subsurface. We use this information both to redatum CR recorded wavefields above the seafloor and to anti-alias CR migration. Also, we show that PS-wave common-offset-vector (COV) GBM can provide adequate anti-aliasing when the receivers are relatively close together (OBC). Synthetic examples illustrate the effectiveness and limitations of these solutions for both OBC and OBN data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140651
2014-06-16
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bevc, D.
    , [1995], Imaging under rugged tomography and complex velocity structures: Phd Thesis SEP-87http://sepwww.Stanford.edu/data/media/public/docs/sep87/paper_html/
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Casasanta, L. and Grion, S.
    2012, Converted-wave controlled-beam migration for vector-offset volumes, 82nd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, MS1.4.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Casasanta, L., GrayS. and Grion, S.
    [2013], PS-wave controlled-beam migration for sparse source or receivers: 75th EAGE Conference & Exhibition Extended Abstracts
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Gray, S.
    , [2013], Spatial sampling, migration aliasing and migrated amplitudes, Geophysics, 78, S157–S164.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hill, R.
    , [2001], Pre-stack Gaussian-beam depth migration, Geophysics66, 1240–1250.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hill, R., Langan, T., Nemeth, T., ZhaoM., and BubeK. P.
    [2002], Beam Methods for Predictive Suppression of Seismic Multiples in Deep Water:Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2118–2121
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hokstad, K.
    , [2000], Multicomponent Kirchhoff migration: Geophysics, 65, 861–873
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lumley, D., J.Claerbout, and D.Bevc
    , [1994], Anti-aliased Kirchhoff 3-D migration: 64th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1282–1285.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Roberts, G., Zhang, Y. and Poole, G.
    , [2013] Source and receiver ghost compensation within a beam migration83rd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 3667–3771.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Thomsen, L.
    [1999], Converted-wave reflection seismology over inhomogeneous, anisotropic media. Geophysics, 64, 678–690.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Trad, D.
    [2009] 5D interpolation: Recovering from acquisition constraints. Geophysics, 74, V123–V132.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Vinje, V., Roberts, G. and Taylor, R.
    , [2008], Controlled beam migration: a versatile structural imaging tool: First Break, 26.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140651
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140651
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error