Generalization of the EPSI Primary Estimation Algorithm for Deep-towed and Slanted Cables

References

1. Aaron, P., O’Toole, R., Barnes, S., Hegge, R.F. and van Borselen, R.G.
   [2008] True-azimuth versus zero-azimuth 3-D multiple prediction in WATS processing. SEG, Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded abstracts, Las Vegas, 2431–2435.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Abma, R.L., Kabir, M.M.N., Matson, K.H., Mitchell, S., Shaw, S.A. and McLain, W.
   [2005] Comparisons of adaptive subtraction methods for multiple attenuation. The Leading Edge, 24(3), 277–280.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baardman, R.H., Verschuur, D.J., van Borselen, R.G., Frijlink, M.O. and Hegge, R.F.
   [2010] Estimation of primaries by sparse inversion using dual sensor data. SEG, Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded abstracts, Denver, 3468–3472.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Berkhout, A.J.
   [1982] Seismic migration, imaging of acoustic energy by wave field extrapolation, A: theoretical aspects. Elsevier (second edition).
   [Google Scholar]
5. Berkhout, A.J. and Verschuur, D.J.
   [1997] Estimation of multiple scattering by iterative inversion, part I: theoretical considerations. Geophysics, 62(5), 1586–1595.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Dragoset, W.H., Moore, I., Yu, M. and Zhao, W.
   [2008] 3D general surface multiple prediction: An algorithm for all surveys. SEG, Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded abstracts, Las Vegas, 2426–2430.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Guitton, A. and Verschuur, D.J.
   [2004] Adaptive subtraction of multiples using the l1-norm. Geophys. Prosp., 52, 27–38.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Lin, T.Y. and Herrmann, F.J.
   [2009] Unified compressive sensing framework for simultaneous acquisition with primary estimation. SEG, Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded abstracts, Houston, 3113–3117.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Lin, T.Y. and Herrmann, F.J.
   [2010] Sparsity-promoting migration from surface-related multiples. SEG, Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded abstracts, Denver, 3333–3337.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Nekut, A.G. and Verschuur, D.J.
    [1998] Minimum energy adaptive subtraction in surface-related multiple elimination. SEG, Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded abstracts, New Orleans, 1507–1510.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Savels, T., de Vos, K. and de Maag, J.W.
    [2011] Surface multiple attenuation through sparse inversion; results for complex synthetics and real data. First Break, 29(1), 55–64.
    [Google Scholar]
12. van Groenestijn, G.J.A. and Verschuur, D.J.
    [2009a] Estimating primaries by sparse inversion and application to near-offset data reconstruction. Geophysics, 74, A23–A28.
    [Google Scholar]
13. van Groenestijn, G.J.A. and Verschuur, D.J.
    [2009b] Estimation of primaries and near offsets by sparse inversion: Marine data applications. Geophysics, 74, R119–R128.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Verschuur, D.J. and Berkhout, A.J.
    [1997] Estimation of multiple scattering by iterative inversion, part II: practical aspects and examples. Geophysics, 62(5), 1596–1611.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Verschuur, D.J., Berkhout, A.J. and Wapenaar, C.P.A.
    [1992] Adaptive surface-related multiple elimination. Geophysics, 57(9), 1166–1177.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Weglein, A.B., Gasparotto, F.A., Carvalho, P.M. and Stolt, R.H.
    [1997] An inverse scattering series method for attenuating multiples in seismic reflection data. Geophysics, 62, 1975–1989.
    [Google Scholar]