1887

Abstract

Summary

Analysis of electrically anisotropic reservoirs has been challenging with traditional petrophysical analysis. Several techniques were proposed as a framework for using graphical cross-plots to evaluate shaly-sand reservoirs. However, there has never been a clear workflow to define shale laminations and shale anisotropy. In this study, we incorporate a depth-dependent Thomas-Stieber model to describe the shale laminations and use core observation to describe the existence of shale anisotropy. From the vertical and horizontal resistivity, an electrical anisotropy template was built in conjunction with the modified Thomas-Stieber model and core observations. The template generated assuming isotropic shale underestimated the hydrocarbon volume. However, the template generated considering the shale as anisotropic improved the estimations of hydrocarbon presence, permitting a global assessment of the hydrocarbon potential of the shaly-sand reservoirs. Using the depth-dependent Thomas-Stieber model we showed the presence of compacted shale laminations. We also showed that electrical anisotropy is a function of shale laminations, shale compaction and sand cementation. Using core observations, we confirmed the shale layers are anisotropic. Our electrical anisotropy template enhanced the accuracy of hydrocarbon identification in the anisotropic reservoir and permitted identification of more pay zones from vertical and horizontal resistivity data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141169
2014-06-16
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, B. Clavaud, J., Nelson, R., Guru, K. U., and Wang, H.
    [2005] Field examples of enhanced hydrocarbon estimation in thinly laminated formation with a triaxial array induction tool: a laminated sand-shale analysis with anisotropic shale. SPWLA 46th Annual Logging Symposium, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, June26–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Fanini, O. N., Kriegshäuser, B. F., Mollison, R. A., Schöen, J. H., and Yu, L.
    [2001] Enhanced low-resistivity pay, reservoir exploration and delineation with the latest multicomponent induction technology integrated with NMR, nuclear, and borehole image measurements. Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, April30–May3.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hossain, Z., Fabricius, I.L., GrattoniA. C. and SolymarM.
    [2011] Petrophysical properties of greensand as predicted from NMR measurements. Petroleum Geoscience, 17(2), 111–125.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hornby, B. E., Schwartzt, L. M. and Hudson, J. A.
    [1994] Anisotropic effective-medium modeling of the elastic properties of shales. Geophysics59, 1570–1583.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Klein, J. D., Martin, P. R., and Allen, D. F.
    [1997] The petrophysics of electrically anisotropic reservoirs. The Log Analyst, May–June, 1997.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Thomas, E. C., and Stieber, S. J.
    [1975] The distribution of shale in sandstone and its effects upon porosity. SPWLA 16th Annual Logging Symposium, June4–7.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141169
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141169
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error