1887

Abstract

Summary

Over the last three decades rock physics has evolved to become a key tool of reservoir geophysics and an integral part of doing quantitative seismic interpretation. This requires prior knowledge and understanding of geophysics, petrophysics, geopressure and geomechanics, which can vary dramatically in basins around the world. These inherit differences create highly variable rocks that can be so complicated and variable, not only on a basin by basin scale, but also on an intra-basinal scale. With these differences a universal rock physics model, both theory and empirical relationships, is difficult to envisage.

However, if a simplistic view is taken then all rock physics models can be simplified to their reliance on an accurate understanding of three important parameters: temperature, pressure and gravity.

To constrain these uncertainties we present in this paper a method of accurately building a rock physics model by integrating temperature and pore pressure data. Further, we demonstrate, by use of analogues, how universal these rock property models are at predicting the elastic properties of a rock with application to un-drilled areas such as, offshore Newfoundland and Labrador.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412562
2015-06-01
2020-06-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Avseth, A., Mukerji, T., Mavko, G. and Dvorkin, J.
    [2010] Rock-physics diagnostics of depositional texture, diagenetic alterations, and reservoir heterogeneity in high-porosity siliciclastic sediments and rocks — A review of selected models and suggested work flows, Geophysics, 75 (5), 75A31–75A47
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Avseth, P., Dvorkin, J., Mavko, G. and Rykkje, J.
    [2000] Rock physics diagnostic of North Sea sands: Link between microstructure and seismic properties: Geophysical Research Letters, 27, 2761–2764, doi: 10.1029/1999GL008468.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL008468 [Google Scholar]
  3. Dennis, H., Bergmo., P. and Holt., T.
    [2005] Tilted oil-water contacts: Modelling the effects of aquifer heterogeneity, in A. G.Dore, and B. A.Vining, eds., Petroleum Geology: North-West Europe and Global Perspectives: Proceedings of the 6th Geology Conference, Geological Society of London.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dvorkin, J., Gutiérrez, M.A. and Nur, A.
    [2002] On the universality of diagenetic trends, The Leading Edge, Jan2002, 40–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dvorkin, J. and Nur, A.
    [1996] Elasticity of high-porosity sandstones: Theory for two North Sea data sets: Geophysics, 61, 1363–1370, doi: 10.1190/1.1444059.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444059 [Google Scholar]
  6. Green, S., O’Connor, S.A., Edwards, A.P., Carter, J.E., Cameron, D.E.L. and Wright, R.
    [2014] Understanding potential pressure regimes in undrilled Labrador deep water by use of global analogues, The Leading Edge, April2014, 414–426.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412562
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412562
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error