1887

Abstract

Summary

In recent years, the coupled UCG-CCS process has been considered as another potential CCS option, which can offer integrated energy recovery from coal and storage of CO2. However, existing potential problems may counteract its potential benefits. To develop a generic UCG-CCS site characterisation workflow, different aspects of this complex process, such as cavity progression and geomechanics, contamination of groundwater and subsidence impacts, need to be re-considered and understood. In this process, the thermo-mechanical behaviour of the roof rock and coal are the initial parameters to predict the stability and the development of the production cavity. These parameters affect heat conduction and the stability and caving of roof materials, especially under conditions of high stress and temperature. In this study, several experimental setups have been designed and built to study the thermo-mechanical properties of coal and overburden rock for UCG process. These experimental data can get an idea of elastic constants of rocks, the fracture growth mechanisms, the fracture orientations the maximum/yield stresses that the sample withstands, the conditions under which spalling occurs in overburden rock, as well as the rate which this take place. These results will be used as input for the modelling of the cavity growth of UCG.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412716
2015-06-01
2020-11-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barzandji, O. H. M., Wolf, K. H. A. A. and Bruining, J.
    [2001] Injecting CO2 for improved CBM production. World Coal10(6), 63–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergen, F. V., Krzystolik, P., Wageningen, N. v., Pagnier, H., Jura, B., Skiba, J., Winthaegen, P. and Kobiela, Z.
    [2009] Production of gas from coal seams in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin in Poland in the post-injection period of an ECBM pilot site. International Journal of Coal Geology77(1–2), 175–187.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Blinderman, M. and Friedmann, S.
    [2006] Underground coal gasification and carbon capture and storage: Technologies and synergies for low-cost, low-carbon syngas and secure storage. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chadwick, A., Arts, R., Bernstone, C., May, F., Thibeau, S. and Zweigel, P.
    [2007] Best practice for the storage of CO2 in saline aquifers- Observations and guidelines from the SACS and CO2STORE Projects. British Geological Survey, Nottingham.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Durucan, S., Korre, A.-Q., Shi, J., Idiens, M., Stahczyk, K., Kapusta, K., Rogut-Dabrowska, A., Kempka, T., Wolf, K.-H., Younger, P., Zavsek, S., Poulsen, N. E., Bojda, D., Franzsen, S., Muresan, M., Gao, J., Beath, A. and Mastalerz, M.
    [2014] TOPS: Technology Options for Coupled Underground Coal Gasification and CO2 Capture and Storage. Energy Procedia63(0), 5827–5835.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hettema, M. H. H.
    [1996] The thermo-mechanical behaviour of sedimentary rock: an experimental study. Geotechnology. Delft University of Technology, Delft.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. IPCC
    IPCC. [2005] Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage IPCC, B.Metz, O.Davidson, H. d.Coninck, M.Loos and L.Meyer (eds.), 431.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Roddy, D. J. and Younger, P. L.
    [2010] Underground coal gasification with CCS: A pathway to decarbonising industry. Energy and Environmental Science3(4), 400–407.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Velasquez, D., Rey, O. and Manrique, E.
    [2006] An overview of carbon dioxide sequestration in depleted oil and gas reservoirs in Florida, USGS Petroleum Province 50. Fourth LACCEI International Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology (LACCEI’2006), Mayagüez, Puerto Rico.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wolf, K.-H. A. A., Hettema, M. H. H., Pater, C. J. d. and Hooijdonk, R. v.
    [1992] Classification of overburden properties for underground coal gasification: laboratory studies under high temperature and in situ stress conditions. ISRM Symposium: Eurock ’92„ J. A.Hudson (ed.), 99–104. International Society of Rock Mechanics, Chester, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412716
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412716
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error