1887

Abstract

Summary

We have developed a geomechanical workflow to simulate (micro)seismicity induced by reservoir deformation. We use a structural model to simulate the position, orientation and size of fracture networks in a reservoir. We use a geomechanical model to simulate effective stress changes throughout the reservoir as response to injection/production. Stress changes are then resolved into normal and shear stresses on the modelled fractures, allowing us to simulate when and where fractures begin to slip, triggering a microseismic event. We simulate event positions, timing, stress drop and fracture length (from which event magnitude is determined) and source mechanism. These parameters can then be groundtruthed with observations from the field.

We apply our workflow to the In Salah CCS project, Algeria. We find good agreement between our simulated microseismic events and observations from the field, both in terms of the rate of microseismic activity through time, event positions, and event magnitudes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413265
2015-06-01
2020-06-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BissellR.C., VascoD.W., AtbiM., HamdaniM., OkwelegbeM., GoldwaterM.H.
    2011. A full field simulation of the In Salah gas production and CO2 storage project using a coupled geomechanical and thermal fluid flow simulator: Energy Procedia4, 3290–3297.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BondC.E., WightmanR., RingroseP.S.
    2013. The influence of fracture anisotropy on CO2 flow: Geophysical Research Letters40, 1284–1289.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. MathiesonA., MidgleyJ., DoddsK., WrightI., RingroseP., SaoulN.
    2010. CO2 sequestration monitoring and verification technologies applied at Krechba, Algeria: The Leading Edge29, 216–222.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. StorkA.L., VerdonJ.P., KendallJ-M.
    2015. Assessing the microseismic response at the In Salah Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) site with a single three-component geophone: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control32, 159–171.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. VascoD.W., RucciA., FerrettiA., NovaliF., BissellR.C., RingroseP.S., MathiesonA.S., WrightI.W.
    2010. Satellite-based measurements of surface deformation reveal fluid flow associated with the geological storage of carbon dioxide: Geophysical Research Letters37, L03303.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. VerdonJ.P., KendallJ-M., StorkA.L., ChadwickR.A., WhiteD.J., BissellR.C.
    2013. Comparison of geomechanical deformation induced by megaton-scale CO2 storage at Sleipner, Weyburn and In Salah: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences110, E2762–E2771.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413265
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413265
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error