1887

Abstract

Summary

Initial stages of velocity model building (VMB) start off from smooth models that capture geological assumptions of the subsurface region under analysis. Acceptable velocity models result from successive iterations of interpretation and seismic data processing. The interpreters ensure that additions/ corrections made by seismic processing are compliant with geological and geophysical knowledge. Seismic processing adds to the model structural elements, faults are one of the most relevant of those events since they can signal reservoir boundaries or hydrocarbon traps.

Initial models exclude faults due to their local scale. Bringing faults into the model in early stages can help to steer the VMB process. This work introduced a tool whose purpose is to assist the interpreters during the initial stages of the VMB, when no seismic data has been migrated. Our novel method is based on machine learning techniques and can automatically identify and localize faults from not migrated seismic data.

Comprehensive research has targeted the fault localization problem, but most of the results are obtained using processed seismic data or images as input. Our approach suggests an additional tool that can be used to speed up the VMB process. Also, if our framework is extended to other seismic events it might become a powerful tool to alleviate interpreters’ work.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141500
2014-06-16
2020-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Admasu, F. and Toennies, K.
    [2004] A model-based approach to automatic 3d seismic horizons correlations across faults. In: Simulation und Visualisierung, 239–250.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bishop, C.M.
    [2006] Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer, New York, ISBN 0387310738; 9780387310732.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cohen, I., Coult, N. and Vassiliou, A.A.
    [2006] Detection and extraction of fault surfaces in 3d seismic data. GEOPHYSICS, 71(4), 21–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Evgeniou, T., Pontil, M. and Poggio, T.
    [2000] Regularization networks and support vector machines. Advances in Computational Mathematics, 13(1), 1–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hale, D.
    [2013] Methods to compute fault images, extract fault surfaces, and estimate fault throws from 3d seismic images. GEOPHYSICS, 78(2), 33–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Tingdahl, K.M., Steen, O., Meldahl, P. and Ligtenberg, J.H.
    [2001] Semi-automatic detection of faults in 3-d seismic signals. SEG Annual Meeting.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141500
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141500
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error