1887

Abstract

Summary

We briefly describe three methods of seabed characterization which are ‘fit for purpose’, in that each approach is well suited to distinct objectives e.g. characterizing glacial geomorphology and shallow glacial geology vs. rapid prediction of seabed sediment distribution via geostatistics. The methods vary from manual ‘expert’ interpretation to increasingly automated and mathematically based models, each with their own attributes and limitations. We would note however that increasing automation and mathematical sophistication does not necessarily equate to improve map outputs, or reduce the time required to produce them. Judgements must be made to select methodologies which are most appropriate to the variables mapped, and according to the extent and presentation scale of final maps.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20142121
2014-09-08
2020-04-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brown, C. J. and Blondel, P.
    [2009] Developments in the application of multibeam sonar backscatter for seafloor habitat mapping. Applied Acoustics, 70(10), 1242–1247.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Diesing, M., Green, S., Stephens, D., Lark, M., Stewart, H. and Dove, D.
    [In Press] Mapping seabed sediments: Comparison of manual, geostatistical, object-based image analysis and machine learning approaches. Continental Shelf Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Green, S., Cooper, R. and Dove, D.
    [In Press] Bembridge rMCZ Post-Survey Site Report. Defra commissioned report on behalf of Cefas, 63.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Goff, J.A., Kraft, B.J., Mayer, L.A., Schock, S.G., Sommerfield, C.K., Olson, H.C., Gulick, S.P.S. and Nordfjord, S.
    [2004] Seabed characterization on the New Jersey middle and outer shelf: correlatability and spatial variability of seafloor sediment properties. Marine Geology, 209, 147–172.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Howe, J.A., Dove, D., Bradwell, T. and Gafeira, J.
    [2012] Submarine geomorphology and glacial history of the Sea of the Hebrides, UK. Marine Geology, 315–318, 64–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hubbard, B. and Glasser, N.F.
    [2005] Field techniques in glaciology and glacial geomorphology. Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lark, R.M., Dove, D., Green, S., Stewart, H. and Stevenson, A.
    [2012] Spatial prediction of seabed sediment texture classes by cokriging from a legacy database of point observations. Sedimentary Geology, 281, 35–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Marchant, B.P. and Lark, R.M.
    [2007] Estimating of linear models of coregionalization by residual maximum likelihood. European Journal of Soil Science, 58, 1506–1513.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ó Cofaigh, C.
    [2012] Ice sheets viewed from the ocean: the contribution of marine science to understanding modern and past ice sheets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 370(1980), 5512–5539.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Pawlowsky-Glahn, V. and Olea, R.A.
    [2004] Geostatistical Analysis of Compositional Data. Oxford University Press, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20142121
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20142121
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error