1887

Abstract

Summary

Due to excellent sedimentary environment in the ocean, strong layering and stratifications can be developed, resulting in distinct electrical anisotropy in the earth under the ocean. Electrical anisotropy can have serious effects on MCSEM survey data; using traditional isotropic models to interpret anisotropic MCSEM data can deliver distorted results. To understand the influence of the electrical anisotropy on MCSEM responses, we study in this paper 3D marine CSEM modeling for an arbitrarily anisotropic earth. We use the staggered finite-difference algorithm, combined with volume average or volume current average method for handling the conductivity tensor elements, accomplish successfully 3D MCSEM modeling for an arbitrarily anisotropic earth. Comparison and analysis of MCSEM responses (MVO and PVO) for different isotropic and anisotropic models reveal the characteristics related to the influence of the electrical anisotropy on Marine EM responses and identification technique from the MCSEM survey for the electrical anisotropy of the media under the ocean. The results obtained from the numerical experiments in this paper offer the technical support to the detailed interpretation of the MCSEM data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20142124
2014-09-08
2020-04-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Constable, S.C.
    [2010] Ten years of marine CSEM for hydrocarbon exploration. Geophysics, 75(5), 75A67–75A81.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cox, C.S.
    [1980] Electromagnetic induction in the oceans and inferences on the constitution of the earth. Geophysical Surveys, 4(1–2), 137–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Colombo, D., McNeice, G., Curiel, E.S. and Fox, A.
    [2013] Full tensor CSEM and MT for subsalt structural imaging in the RedSea: Implications for seismic and electromagnetic integration. The Leading EDGE, 32(4), 436–449.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Edwards, R.N. and Chave, A.D.
    [1986] A transient electric dipole-dipole method for mapping the conductivity of the sea floor. Geophysics, 51(4), 984–987.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Eidesmo, T., Ellingsurd, S., MacGregor, L.M., Constable, S.C., Sinha, M.C., Johanson, S., Kong, F. N. and Westerdahl, H.
    [2002] Sea bed Logging(SBL), a new method for remote and direct identification of hydrocarbon filled layers in deepwater areas. First Break, 20(3), 144–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gribenko, A. and Zhdanov, M.S.
    [2007] Rigorous 3D inversion of marine CSEM data based on the integral equation method. Geophysics, 72(2), WA73–WA84.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sasaki, Y.
    [2013] 3D inversion of marine CSEM and MT data:An approach to shallow-water problem. Geophysics, 78(1), E59–E65.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Torgeir, W., Bjørn, U. and Ketil, H.
    [2013] 2.5D EM modelling in TIV conductive media and the effect of anisotropy in normalized amplitude responses. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 10(2013)015006(10pp).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Weidelt, P.
    [2007] Guided Waves in Marine CSEM. Geophysical Journal International, 171, 153–176.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Yin, C.
    [2006] MMT forward modeling for a layered earth with arbitrary anisotropy. Geophysics, 71(3), G155–G128.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20142124
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20142124
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error